My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006250
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
1111
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544294
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006250
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2019 4:28:10 PM
Creation date
3/29/2019 4:16:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006250
RECORD_ID
PR0544294
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0007044
FACILITY_NAME
SAFEWAY MEAT PROCESSING PLANT
STREET_NUMBER
1111
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16326007
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1111 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Stockton Meat Plant - Case Closure Page 4 <br /> March, 1996 <br /> Site Assessment Re�ort,,�1991-92} <br /> rIn March, 1991, ERM-West conducted a site assessment to identify if <br /> hydrocarbons from the former underground tanks on the Safeway site had <br /> ' migrated off site The work and findings were reported in a Site Assessment <br /> Report, dated January, 1992 The conclusions, figures, tables, and MW-5 and <br /> MW-6 construction logs are presented in Attachment E <br /> ' The ERM-West work documented diesel concentrations in soils and ground <br /> water off-site, south of the former underground tank site Soil and ground <br />' water samples were taken using HydroPunch sampling techniques <br /> Hydrocarbons in soils, as in previous investigations, were detected in deeper <br /> samples (approximately 25 feet below ground in the sandy soils underlying <br /> the silty clay upper strata) Ground water from HydroPunch samples were <br /> reported with petroleum hydrocarbons ranging from trace to 160 mg/l <br /> concentrations <br /> Duringthis site assessment, three monitoring wells MW-1 -2 and -3 were <br /> g <br /> destroyed and abandoned because of declining ground water levels and the <br />' assumption that the wells were installed upgradient of the area of concern <br /> However, to expand the groundwater monitoring, two additional monitoring <br /> wells were installed, MW-5 and MW-6 MW-5 was positioned Just south and <br /> east of the underground tanks MW-6 was constructed within Navy Dr and <br /> on the southern edge of the street MW-6 required special permitting, as well <br /> as exact placement, because of utilities (sewer, gas, and electric) within this <br /> area of the street <br /> Ground Water Monitoring 1992-95 <br /> After the site assessment work was completed in 1992, Safeway continued <br /> monitoring ground water quality and flow direction for the next three years <br /> From 1992 to 1995, eight sampling events were completed and documented in <br /> ground water monitoring reports submitted to San Joaquin County PHS The <br />' last sampling report, dated June 15, 1995, is included in Attachment F <br /> Table 1 summarizes the results of the groundwater sampling events Total <br />' petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel has been reported in every sampling event <br /> The concentrations are at trace levels, ranging from 150 ppb to 1,200 ppb In <br /> three sampling events, BTEX was requested for analysis No BTEX was <br />' reported in these samples In the March, 1995, analysis for polynuclear <br /> aromatics hydrocarbons (PNAs) was requested for the purposes of evaluating <br /> the ground water for a potential risk assessment Only three compounds <br /> were detected in MW-6 at trace concentrations (phenanthrene - 0 95 ug/l, <br /> anthracene - 7 7 ug/1, and pyrene - 0 038 ug/1) No PNAs were reported in <br /> MW-4 or MW-5 Because MW-6 was installed near the two main sewer pipes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.