My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
1111
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0538728
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2020 2:31:25 PM
Creation date
4/1/2019 10:01:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0538728
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0022234
FACILITY_NAME
ZACKY & SONS POULTRY LLC
STREET_NUMBER
1111
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16326007
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1111 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Kirk Vandergeest, CFO - 3 - 25 July 2016 <br /> Zacky & Sons Poultry, LLC <br /> MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3 are located in areas that are appropriate for evaluating groundwater <br /> directly beneath the pond, but are not located in areas to determine if potential leaks from the <br /> wastewater system are impacting groundwater or to determine background groundwater quality. <br /> A limited groundwater background evaluation was conducted by the Discharger using data from <br /> former J.M. Equipment Company; a neighboring facility located approximately 1,000 feet south <br /> of the Discharger. Based on the 2015 2nd Semi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring report for the <br /> J.M. Equipment Company, the groundwater flow direction is generally to the northeast and <br /> cross-gradient from the Discharger's location. However, the groundwater gradient and flow <br /> direction at the Discharger's location was estimated to be northwest. Secondly, the J.M. <br /> Equipment Company data set did not include the full range of salinity constituents needed to <br /> characterize the groundwater when comparing data sets between the Discharger and the former <br /> J.M. Equipment Company. In addition, there is insufficient information to determine if the data <br /> from J.M. Equipment Company represents background groundwater conditions. Because of the <br /> uncertainty in the applicability of the data from J.M. Equipment, it is unknown if the activities at <br /> the Discharger's facility are the source of groundwater pollution or if the facility is contributing to <br /> existing pollution. Further evaluation is required to determine the source of pollution and to <br /> evaluate background groundwater quality. <br /> Legal Provisions <br /> The groundwater beneath the facility contains salinity pollutants at concentrations greater than <br /> WQOs as shown in the table above. The source and extent of the pollution has not been <br /> determined. It is unclear if the facility is the source of pollution or contributing pollution to <br /> already impacted groundwater. Continued sampling of the existing groundwater monitoring <br /> wells is required as shown in the MRP (Attachment C). In addition, further characterization of <br /> the groundwater and investigation of the facility's wastewater system are required to identify the <br /> source of pollution and establish background groundwater quality. <br /> Water Code section 13267 states, in relevant part: <br /> In conducting an investigation specified in subdivision (a), the regional board may <br /> require that any person who has discharged, discharges, or is suspected of having <br /> discharged or discharging, or who proposes to discharge waste... that could affect the <br /> quality of waters within its region shall furnish, under penalty of perjury, technical or <br /> monitoring program reports which the regional board requires. The burden, including <br /> costs, of these reports shall bear a reasonable relationship to the need for the report <br /> and the benefits to be obtained from the reports. In requiring those reports, the <br /> regional board shall provide the person with a written explanation with regard to the <br /> need for the reports, and shall identify the evidence that supports requiring that person <br /> to provide the reports. <br /> Section 13268 of the California Water Code states, in part: <br /> (a)Any person failing or refusing to furnish technical or monitoring program reports <br /> as required by subdivision (b) of Section 13267.... is guilty of a misdemeanor and <br /> may be liable civilly in accordance with subdivision (b). <br /> (b)(1) Civil liability may be administratively imposed by a regional board...in an <br /> amount which shall not exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each day in which <br /> the violation occurs. <br /> In order to determine the nature and extent of groundwater contamination potentially due <br /> to the Discharger's activities, and to obtain the additional information necessary to <br /> develop WDRs, the Discharger is ordered to submit the technical reports described <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.