Laserfiche WebLink
.-� KAYO Olt <br /> COMPANY 1221 East Main Street Chattanooga, TN 37408-1696 <br /> ~ � <br /> ^JET (b15) 756-5770 <br /> a V=alyza <br /> August 21, 1985 <br /> SEP 4 1985 <br /> CERTIFIED MAIL ENViROMENTAL HEALTH <br /> RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED PERMIT/SERVICES <br /> Mr. William S. Johnson <br /> Assistant Executive Officer <br /> Central Valley Region <br /> Ua___MQ;:ality Co trcl Boar.. <br /> 3201 S Street <br /> Sacramento, CA 95816-7090 ; <br /> RE: Site Assessment Plans For Douglas 01.1 Company Stations - <br /> Lodi• Stockton; Jackson, California <br /> Dear Mr. Johnson: <br /> In response to your letter. of August 14, 1985, Douglas/Kayo Oil Company <br /> respects your position regarding the California Water Code and the Health and <br /> Safety Code. In addition, we agree with the spirit and the intent with which <br /> your letter was written. The meeting held in Stockton, California on Thursday, <br /> August 15, 1985, addressed many of the requests listed in your August 14 <br /> letter. A list of those attending the meeting is enclosed for your information. <br /> Douglas/Kayo's policy and position regarding environmental affairs states in <br /> part, . . .to comply with all environment.1 laws and regulations related to <br /> environmental quality,"- and ". . .to maintain contingency plans to cleanup <br /> discharges of gasoline or other materiali caused by the Company." Furthermore, <br /> the purpose of the initial investigation was to ensure environmentally sound <br /> stations would be transferred to the new owner. Our Company has been prepared' <br /> to respond to the conditions found at each site and it is in that spirit that <br /> we intena-to ex-�eatte-the resolutions-to the problems found. <br /> Each of your six requests are discussed below and our responses to those <br /> requests are also given. <br /> 1. Douglas/Kayo believes the inte t of the Regional Board is to have <br /> r the groundwater conditions monitored on a specific schedule at each <br /> site and have the free product bailed from those monitoring wells <br /> r7 where it has accumulated. Monitoring all on-site monitoring wells <br /> woo is technically unsound in that several of the first wells installed <br /> do not encounter groundwater. A thorough assessment cannot be made <br /> �bf the subsurface condition at those monitoring well sites. <br /> f <br /> t <br />