Laserfiche WebLink
t <br /> between the depths of 25 and 35 feet in this area ranged from 10 to 50 ppm Therefore, it is our <br /> conclusion that the maximum depth of contamination north of sample JL-P-3 was 30 feet or Cess <br /> 9.2 Areal Extent of Contamination <br /> Samples JIrP-9 through JL-P-26 confirm that the lateral extent of contamination has been delineated <br /> on the north, east, and south If the location of sample JL-P-3 is taken as the former location of the <br /> southeastern dispenser(see Figure 2), then contamination extended 12 feet to the east of the dispenser <br /> prior to excavation Contamination extended 20-25 feet to the south of the dispenser and 45-50 feet to <br /> the north along the product lune <br /> Contamination also extended at least 25 feet west of the dispenser, however, due to the location of the <br /> service station building, not all of the contaminated soil could be removed in this direction The western <br /> limit of contamination is probably close to the foundation of the building If so, it is possible that an <br /> area measuring 15 ft x 30 ft x 10 ft may contain residual hydrocarbons <br /> 9.3 Potential for Groundwater Contamination <br /> According to the Fall 1993 "Lines of Equal Depth of Water Wells" map published by the Flood <br /> Control Section of the San Joaquin County Department of Public Works, the depth to groundwater in <br /> the site area was between 35 and 40 feet in the late 1993 Historically, 1993 was a relatively low water <br /> year Therefore, if the 1993 map is correct, it is probable that groundwater has been as shallow as 30 <br /> feet in wetter years As this depth is within 5 feet of the maximum depth of contaminated soul, it is <br /> possible that groundwater has been impacted Based on the probable minimum historic depth of <br /> groundwater, the site would not be eligible for closure under the LUFT Leaching Potential procedure <br /> 9.4 Groundwater Assessment <br /> Further investigation of the potential impact to groundwater may be warranted This could be achieved <br /> either by installing a groundwater monitoring well in the central portion of the spill area (between <br /> samples JL-P-3 and JL-P-13) or by drilling two or three borings and collecting water samples with a <br /> hydropunch-type device <br /> 9.5 Further Soil Remediation <br /> Although remediation of the remaining contaminated soil along the west wall of the excavation might <br /> be desirable, it cannot be achieved by excavation without demolishing the building Upgradnent <br /> Environmental recommends that this soil be left in place <br /> t <br /> The residual contamination on the west sidewall is contained within unit 4, a sand layer that ranges <br /> from absent to approximately 5 feet in thickness Grain size ranges from very coarse on the east <br /> sndewall to fine on the west sndewall The unit is underlain by a caliche-cemented clay bed that is <br /> relatively uniform in thickness and appears to have significantly slowed downward migration of <br /> gasoline These conditions are amenable to nn-situ remediation technologies that rely on permeability, <br /> 8 <br />