Laserfiche WebLink
Maintenance Department <br /> D <br /> JUUNI TED ST13TES <br /> AOSTAL SERVICE <br /> EP 2 6 2011 <br /> ENVIRONMENT IIEALln <br /> September 22, 2011 PERMfT/SERVICES <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department Certified Number: 7010 1060 0000 3991 0344 <br /> 600 E Main Street <br /> Stockton CA 95202-3029 <br /> RE: Invoice– USPS, 3131 Arch-Airport Rd, Stockton CA <br /> AR0026478 <br /> Facility FA0015368 <br /> Invoice#IN0212370 <br /> Dear Madam or Sir: <br /> We are in receipt of your invoice under account AR0026478 for environmental and hazmat fees for <br /> the U S Postal service addressed to the acility at Arch-Airport Rd., Stockton, CA 95213. <br /> Upon review by our legal counsel, it has been recommended that the facility pay the small generator <br /> hazardous waste fee$213 plus the penalty of$213 along with the Unified Program fee of$24 and the <br /> Electronic reporting fee of$25. Although there are viable legal arguments concerning the amount of <br /> the unified fee and the electronic fee, we are willing to offer to compromise and pay the entire fee and <br /> penalty amount. We reserve the right to contest these fees if the offer is not accepted. However, the <br /> Hazmat Fee and the penalty fee for hazmat fees are not payable. Therefore, a check in the amount <br /> of$475 will be sent to you separately by the Postal Accounting Center. <br /> The U S Postal Service is an "independent establishment of the executive branch of the Government <br /> of the United States". 39 U.S.C. Section 201. As a matter of law, it is well established that the Postal <br /> Service is immune from state of local law of this type. Based upon the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. <br /> Constitution, courts have consistently held that the federal government is not subject to local <br /> regulation unless Congress specifically and unequivocally waives the immunity of the United States. <br /> See, e.g., Johnson v. State of Maryland, 254 U>S> 51 (1920) (vehicle licensing)' United States Postal <br /> Service v. City of Hollywood, FL, 974 F. Supp. 1459 (S.D. Fla. 1997) (local building code). It is well <br /> settled that the activities of the Federal government are not subject—absent its consent—to <br /> regulation, restrictin, or taxation by the state and local governments. See Mayo v. United States, 319 <br /> U.S. 441 (1943). Because of the fundamental importance of the principles shielding federal <br /> installations and activities from regulation by the States, an authorization of state regulation is found <br /> only when and to the extent there is a 'clear congressional mandate', 'specific congressional action', <br /> that make this authorization of state regulation 'clear and unambiguous'. Id. At 447-448. <br /> Sovereign immunity applies because Congress has not subjected federal entities to the federal <br /> Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know law and therefore there is no provision to allow <br /> state of local application of similar laws to the federal government. An EPA opinion from 1988 <br /> 3131 ARCH AIRPORT ROAD <br /> STOCKTON CA 95213-9731 <br /> (209)938-6252 <br /> FAX:(209)983-6461 <br />