Laserfiche WebLink
Oil Ex loration and Production Wastes Initiative I I I Discussion of Results <br />2. "The potential presence of chlorinated compounds in some ESOP wastes y <br />or may not be an issue, depending on the constituent. Many chlorinated <br />compounds regulated under the TCLP and as such would fall under the limited <br />tf<P exemption available under state law". <br />3. "As noted in the report, a substantial percentage of produced water is <br />beneficially reused in enhanced oil recovery operations. Produced water that is <br />discharged to surface waters, POTWs or otherwise applied to land (e.g., <br />discharged to evaporation ponds) is regulated by the regional water quality <br />control boards, local POTWs or other state or local agencies, and must meet <br />applicable discharge limits prior to disposal. We are not aware of any situation in <br />which VOCs or SVOC in produced water have posed an environmental concern." <br />4. "Drilling t are nonhazardous even prior to aggregation with cement for <br />purposes of stabilization. Confirming to are available". <br />5."Over the years, WSPA has been extensively involved in the development of <br />regulatory requirements applicable to roadmix operations. As you are aware, <br />DTSC along with other Cal -EPA agencies participated in a Task Force study <br />entitled "Cal/EPA Exploration and Production Regulatory Task Force, Beneficial <br />Reuse of Nonhazardous Oil -Field Road Mix Clarification of Regulatory Issues, <br />March 1999". A formal Ca PA report was issued in March 1999. The Task <br />Force reviewed many aspects of the Beneficial Reuse of Nonhazardous Oilfield <br />Road mix materials. The Report cited that guidelines developed by the Industry <br />which clearly recognize the hydrocarbon -containing materials for use in oilfield <br />road mix must be characterized "nonhazardous". <br />The study shows that, depending on circumstances of production, certain E&P <br />wastestreams may exhibit hazardous waste characteristics not covered under <br />the E&P exemption. Although exempted from regulation as hazardous wastes at <br />the Federal level, those E&P wastes are subject to regulation as hazardous in <br />California and cannot be managed as non -hazardous under the Federal E&P <br />exemption. DTSC should emphasize that oil production facilities, as potential <br />generators of hazardous wastes, must ensure proper disposal of their wastes, in <br />accordance with standards for waste characterization set forth in 22 CCR, <br />Section 66262.11, as well as meet other standards applicable to generators of <br />hazardous wastes provided under 22 CCR Section 66262.10 et seq. <br />Chart 1 is a flow diagram depicting one approach to achieving proper <br />management of E&P wastes in California. <br />Statewide Compliance Division _May 2002 <br />-43- <br />