Laserfiche WebLink
Corrective Action Plan Page 7 <br /> extend from beneath the paving down to a depth of some 12 to 14 ft and penetrates into <br /> the deeper strata composed of loose sands <br /> Based on the results of analyses of soil samples and olfactory indicators noted on the <br /> boring logs, it appears that the total depth to which the soil has been contaminated in the <br /> Lvicinity of Well ULT 9 may have been locally influenced by excavations that were made to <br /> install the sanitary-sewer lateral that serves the property (refer to Figure 2 for location) In <br /> bonngs at distance from this area, the maximum depth at which the presence of <br /> components of gasoline was signaled by sample analyses or olfactory indicators was 14 ft <br /> or less <br /> As stated, the interpretations of the estimated maximum extent of soil contamination <br /> shown on Figures 7 and 8 are believed to be conservative Because the specific gravity of <br /> hydrocarbon fuels is less than 1 0, when leaking gasoline reaches groundwater it floats and <br /> then spreads by lateral dissemination over the water table Thus, the highest <br /> concentrations of components of hydrocarbon fuels in the soil are expected to be present <br /> in a zone within a short distance above and below the water table This interpretation is <br /> supported by the data shown on Figures 3 and 4 that note the presence, or lack thereof, of <br /> olfactory indicators or analytically detectable components of hydrocarbon fuels in soil <br /> samples recovered from the subsurface <br /> The data summarized on Figures 3 and 4 indicates that the soil is free of contamination <br /> beneath the 152 East 11th Street site in the zone between the ground surface and the first <br /> occurrence of affected soil dust above the water table This is consistent with the known <br /> mechanism by which gasoline that has leaked from underground storage tanks is <br /> disseminated through the subsurface However, if there were any sources of leakage at, or <br /> close to, the ground surface, there may be local areas where contaminated soil is present at <br /> higher elevations than indicated on Figures 7 and 8 This is suspected to be the case in the <br /> vicinity of the canopy structure located on the East 11 th Street frontage of the property <br /> (see Figure 2 for location) This was the location of the dispensing-pump island when the <br /> site was an active service station Contamination of shallow soils due to spillage and leaks <br /> from points in piping are commonly found at such locations Based on available records, it <br /> appears that the condition of shallow soils around the former location of the pump island <br /> was not explored at the time the storage tanks were removed and the piping that <br /> connected the tanks to the pumps may still be buried in the subsurface <br /> REMEDIATION STRATEGY <br /> To develop the original corrective action plan for the subject site (Ref 14), the <br /> applicability of alternate remedial technologies was studied in the context of the site- <br /> specific geotechnical, hydrogeologic, groundwater-quality, construction engineering, and <br /> site infrastructure and usage parameters and the interactions between them <br /> The principal constraints that affect the choice of remedial technologies for this site are <br /> the adverse subsurface conditions in terms of the stability of excavations and the potential <br />