Laserfiche WebLink
Results of Groundwater Pumping Tests - 152 East l I th Street, Tracy Page 10 <br /> ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS OF PUMPING TESTS <br /> Hydrogeological Model <br /> Interpretation of groundwater pumping test data requires a hydrogeological model The <br /> geotechnical parameters of concern to the development of the model are the relative <br /> hydraulic conductivities and thickness' of the strata and their horizontal and vertical <br /> distribution The boring logs presented in Appendix A show that, in terms of the <br /> parameters of importance to interpretation of data from groundwater pumping tests, the <br /> hydrostratigraphy beneath and around the site can be represented in the simplified form <br /> shown on Figure 7 Silty clay of relatively low hydraulic conductivity, from the ground <br /> surface to a depth of approximately 14 ft overlies a layer of fine- to medium-course sand <br /> of higher conductivity This stratum is approximately 11 ft thick and is underlain by <br /> another stratum of silty clay, the top of which is at about 25 ft beneath the ground <br /> surface This hydrosrtatigraphy is essentially continuous over broad areas of the site <br /> The static water table is about 8 ft beneath the surface and both the pumped well, NAV 6, <br /> and the observation well, NAV 3, penetrate to the bottom of the sand layer at a depth of <br /> 25 ft They are screened from approximately one foot above the water table to a depth <br /> close to the bottom of the sand stratum During drilling, first water was typically <br /> encountered at 8 to 13 ft beneath the surface (i e above the top of the sand stratum) and <br /> after the wells were completed, water levels rapidly reached a static condition at a depth <br /> of approximately 8 ft beneath the surface <br /> Given the stratified nature of the geology, with a relatively high-permeability layer of sand <br /> occurring beneath a surface stratum of comparatively low-permeability silty clay and with <br /> a second stratum of silty clays occurring below the sand, it is appropriate, for the purposes <br /> of practical analysis, to treat the sand stratum as an essentially confined aquifer and apply <br /> the standard Cooper and Jacobs (1946) methods for computation of transmissivity and <br /> storativity from the groundwater pumping test data However, based on the evidence from <br /> the drilling logs that the clay material contains a significant fraction of silt and courser <br /> material, and that first water was encountered well above the top of the sand, it is <br /> reasonable to presume that there is some degree of hydraulic communication between the <br /> strata and that the degree of hydraulic confinement of the sand may be low These factors <br /> should be taken into consideration when evaluating hydraulic conductivity and derivative <br /> parameters <br /> Aquifer and Well Parameters <br /> Transmisslyity <br /> The drawdown data from the pumped well, NAV 6, obtained during the pumping tests <br /> performed on December 28th 1993 are presented on Figure 8 in the form of a plot of <br /> drawdown versus the logarithm of the elapsed time since the pump was started As shown <br />