Laserfiche WebLink
Results of Groundwater Pumping Tests - 152 East 1 lth Street, Tracy Page 8 <br /> The test equipment was setup in the manner previously described, with the suction line, <br /> pump body and the section of discharge hose up-stream of the shut-off valve filled with <br /> water pumped from buckets The undisturbed depths to static water in the well to be <br /> pumped, NAV 6, and in NAV 3, the observation well, were measured using the <br /> conductivity-type water level probe <br /> Pumping from Well NAV 6 was started at 11 OOAM by rapidly opening the discharge <br /> shut-off valve shortly after the pump had been brought to full power The drawdown in <br /> Well NAV 6 was first measured 0 5 min after the start of the test, again 1 00 nun from <br /> the start and then at 1 00 min intervals up to 10 nun after the start of pumping <br /> Thereafter, these measurements were made at the times shown in Table 4, that records the <br /> data gathered during the test A first drawdown measurement was made in the observation <br /> well 15 00 min after the test started and more were made later at the times recorded in <br /> Table 4 <br /> During the progress of the test, the flow-meter reading was carefully observed and, as <br /> necessary, the flow-regulating valve and the pump air-supply were adjusted slightly to <br /> sustain a constant rate of discharge of 9 5 GPM, which was confirmed by checking the <br /> flow-meter reading against the mean time required to repeatedly fill a container of known <br /> volume with the discharged groundwater <br /> After a total pumping period of 160 min , a field plot of drawdown in the pumping well <br /> versus the logarithm of the pumping time showed that function to have maintained a <br /> straight-line form since a measurement of drawdown had been made 10 00 minutes after <br /> the test was started That being the case, and observing that the air temperature was <br /> steadily falling and there was a significant risk that conditions would develop that would <br /> cause the pump to freeze, pumping from Well NAV 6 was stopped by rapidly closing the <br /> discharge-line, shut-off valve Measurements of residual drawdown were then made while <br /> the wells recovered and until the water levels returned to close to their original elevations <br /> These measurements are also recorded in Table 4 <br /> Pumping Test on January 18th. 1994 <br /> Although the pumping test conducted on December 28th 1993 had been successful, it was <br /> decided that, if a suitable break in the weather appeared to be forthcoming, a second <br /> pumping test would be run using the Hermit SE2000 data logger and pressure transducer <br /> array to measure drawdown and recovery in the pumped and observation wells This <br /> second phase of testing was principally intended to be confirmatory and, through use of <br /> the data logger and pressure transducer array, to check that sufficient early time data had <br /> been obtained from the test conducted on December 28th , to preclude inadvertent <br /> miscalculation of geohydraulic parameters and to confirm that the small values of <br /> drawdown that had been observed in the observation well were reproducible <br /> An apparently reliable weather forecast was obtained for January 18th 1994 and <br /> personnel and equipment were mobilized into the field However, upon arrival, it was <br />