Laserfiche WebLink
Corrective Action Pian Page 17 <br /> of contaminated groundwater while maintaiiung the total flow rate to the treatment system <br /> within its rated capacity <br /> To check that the proposed groundwater pumping rate will be sufficient to recover <br /> contaminated water from throughout the area affected by contamination without <br /> excessively drawing down the water table, the following estimates of water table <br /> drawdown and radius of influence of the groundwater recovery wells have been made <br /> Drawdown. To prevent the submersible pumps running in air and overheating, the water <br /> level in a recovery well must not be drawn down to such a level that there is less than 2 ft <br /> of water above the top of the pump Refemng to Figure 9, and allowing for the 3 ft sand <br /> trap at the bottom of the casing and a pump with a body length of 2 ft, this limitation <br /> restricts pumping from an individual well to a rate that will produce a maximum <br /> drawdown of 11 ft (i a under maximum drawdown the water level in the well casing <br /> would be 18 ft below the ground surface) <br /> During groundwater pumping tests conducted at the site in January 1994 (Ref 11), <br /> pumping from a well of similar depth and screened over a similar interval to the proposed <br /> recovery wells lowered the water level in the well casing by 4 45 ft within one minute <br /> after start of pumping at a steady rate of 9 5 gpm The logarithmic slope of the time- <br /> drawdown plot, As, was 0 58 Applying the proportionality rules for the relationships <br /> between pumping rate and drawdown and As (Ref 3), for a 10 gpm pumping rate the <br /> drawdown after 1 nun would be 4 68 ft and the adjusted value of As would be 0 61 <br /> Applying the figures given above to the case of pumping from a single well yields an <br />' estimated drawdown of 8 16 ft at the proposed normative pumping rate of 10 gpm after <br /> steady pumping for one year This is well within the 11 ft lirrutation that has been set to <br /> protect the pumps and allows a margin of safety for the drawdown that will actually occur <br /> when all three wells are pumped simultaneously <br /> Maximum Singlc-well Pumping Rate- Using the same methods of estimation, if a single <br /> well was pumped at a steady rate of 15 gpm the water level in the casing would be drawn <br /> down 11 ft (i a to 18 ft beneath the ground surface - the limn established to protect the <br /> pumps) after approximately two weeks (14 days) Based on this estimate, the maximum <br /> sustained rate of groundwater extraction under conditions when water is pumped from any <br /> one of the three proposed recovery wells has been set at 15 gpm <br /> If desired, single-well, pumping rates greater than 15 gpm could actually be sustained for <br /> periods up to several days without drawing down the water level in the casing to a depth <br /> greater than 18 ft beneath the ground surface Also, even if that limit were reached, the <br /> pumps would not actually be damaged because, as described later, their action will be <br /> controlled by signals from level sensors installed in the well so that they will be energized <br /> and de-energized as water levels rise and fall above and below preset limits However, in <br /> general, such a mode of operation will be avoided because it would cause excessive on-off <br /> cycling of the groundwater extraction and treatment system <br />