Laserfiche WebLink
Corrective Action Plan Page 27 <br /> Air-Quality Concerns <br />} Under SJVUAPCD Rule 2220 an Authority to Construct or Permit to Operate is not <br /> required for any process unit if the uncontrolled emissions of air contaminants does not <br /> exceed 2 pounds in any 24 hour period (Ref 4 ) <br /> If it is conservatively assumed that all of the components of fuel hydrocarbons in the <br /> affected groundwater are volatile and the air stripper will be 100% effective in removing <br /> these compounds, the concentration of total petroleum hydrocarbons in the stream of <br /> water passing through the treatment system, when it is operating at its rated hydraulic <br /> capacity of 30 gpm, would have to be 5 55 mg/liter (ppm) before emissions from the air <br /> stripper would be equal to the regulatory hnut of 2 lb per day For the reasons discussed <br /> below, it is extremely unlikely that this limit will be approached However, as is also <br /> described later, provision has been made to manage any unexpected increase in <br /> contaminant loading that might occur <br /> As has been previously discussed, a very conservative estimate of the maximum total <br /> concentration of dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons in the influent stream to the <br /> groundwater treatment has been made for the purpose of sizing the process equipment <br /> That estimate is conservative because it was derived from the results of analyses of <br /> groundwater samples recovered from monitoring wells in the most contaminated zones <br /> beneath the site and considered historical data that includes unique, single-sample <br /> occurrences where the apparent concentration of hydrocarbons in the groundwater was an <br /> order of magnitude greater than those that have been consistently detected since a regular <br /> program of water-quality monitoring has been established Despite that conservatism, the <br /> estimated maximum contaminant concentration of 5 3 ppm in the treatment system <br /> 4 influent is less than the concentration that would cause uncontrolled emissions from the <br /> system to exceed the regulatory linvt even when it is assumed that the treatment system <br /> runs continuously at it rated hydraulic capacity of 30 gpm and, regardless of their <br /> volatility, the au stripper could extract 100% of the hydrocarbons compounds from the <br /> water <br /> Although the extreme estimate cited above is useful as a check to see that the treatment <br /> system can be safely operated without generating excessive emissions to the air, a more <br /> functional result can be obtained by considering the results from analyses of groundwater <br /> samples recovered from morutonng wells NAV-3, NAV-4 and ULT-9 (all of which are in <br /> the near field of the proposed recovery wells), in the period July 1993 through February <br /> 1994 (See Table 3 for the relevant water-quality data) Because they represent current <br /> groundwater-quality conditions in the subsurface beneath the site, these data more closely <br /> approxnriate the situation the that are likely to prevail when the proposed remediation <br /> i system begins operation <br /> When the water-quality data obtained from samples recovered from wells NAV-3, NAV-4 <br /> and ULT-9 in the period July 1993 through February 1994 are used, an estimated <br /> maximum total contaminant concentration of 2 1 ppm in the influent to the treatment <br />