Laserfiche WebLink
t <br /> J <br /> Extended Investigation of Groundwater Quality - 152 East 11th Street, Tracy Page 5 <br /> The drilling equipment was used to advance a spht-spoon sampling tool loaded with four <br /> clean, 2 in diameter by 6 m long brass tubes so as to recover soil samples from depths of <br /> 5, 10 and 15 ft in the boretngs for all four wells (i e NAV 5, NAV 6, NAV 7 and NAV <br /> 8) To provide as much information as possible about the distribution of hydrocarbons, if <br /> any, to the subsurface at the well locations, it was initially planned to also take samples <br /> from 20 and 25 ft in each boring even though it was anticipated that some problems may <br /> be encountered to recovering samples from beneath the water table However, fine to <br /> medium course, flowing sand was countered in each of the four holes at depths of between <br /> 15 and 19 ft This sand rose in the augers and to some cases trapped the sampling tool in <br /> the augers and prevented sampling. Consequently, samples could not be recovered from <br /> greater depth sin all of the wells Despite these difficulties, samples were obtained from a <br /> depth of 20 ft in Wells NAV 6 and NAV 7 and in the case of NAV 7 an additional sample <br /> was recovered from a depth of 24 ft The incidents of flowing sand rising in the augers is <br /> noted on the monitoring well logs (See Appendix A) The blow counts recorded as the <br /> sampling tool was advanced tato the bottom of the boring at each sampling depth are also <br /> noted on the logs <br /> Following sample recovery and examination of the core, the brass tube from the selected <br /> sampling depth was removed from the sampling tool, cleaned externally, its ends covered <br /> with alummum foil and closed with tightly fitting plastic caps The caps were secured with <br /> adhesiveless tape Each selected sample tube was then labeled for identification, entered <br /> into chain-of-custody control and packed on chemical ice for transport, within 24 hours, to <br /> Chromalab Inc 's laboratory m San Ramon, California for analysis <br /> The soil samples were analyzed for the following suite of analytes <br /> Analyte Method of Analysis <br /> Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons EPA Method 5030/8015 <br /> (as Gasoline) <br /> Benzene EPA Method 8020 <br /> Toluene EPA Method 8020 <br /> Ethylbenzene EPA Method 8020 <br /> Total Xylenes EPA Method 8020 <br /> None of the samples contained any detectable concentrations of gasoline or its <br /> components The analytical results are included in summary form in Table 1 and copies of <br /> the laboratory certificates of analysis are presented in Appendix B (Note For convenience <br /> of reference, the results of the analyses of all soil samples recovered from all well boremp <br /> that have been for sunk for both the 152 and 153 East 11th, Street properties are compiled <br /> m Table 6) <br />