Laserfiche WebLink
MAY-06-2011 22 50 Service Station Systems 408 938 8888 P.05 <br /> S, PWING SUMP TESTING <br /> Test Method Developed By: ❑ Sump Manufacturer M Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer <br /> ❑ Other(Specify) <br /> Test Method Used: ❑ Pressure ❑ Vacuum ® Hydrostatic <br /> ❑ Other(.Specify) <br /> Test Equipment Used: Incon Sump Tester Equipment Resolution: +/-0.002" <br /> a�. <br /> .&F2VV*M --GIN OF <br /> STP Sump#87 STP Sump#89 STP Sump 491 <br /> Sump Diameter: 42" 42" 42" <br /> Sump Depth: 63" 63" 64" <br /> Sump Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass _ Fiberglass <br /> Height from Tank Top to Top of 16" 19" 23" <br /> Highest Piping Penetration: <br /> Height from Tank Top to Lowest 17" 18" 1799 <br /> Electrical penetration: <br /> Condition of sump prior to testing: Good Good Good <br /> Portion of Sump Tested' 2" above piping 2" above piping 2"above piping <br /> Does turbine shut down when <br /> sump sensor detects liquid(both ❑Yes ❑No ®NA ❑ Yes❑No ®NA ❑ Yes ❑No ®NA <br /> product and water)?* <br /> Turbine shutdown response time N/A N/A N/A <br /> Is system programmed for fail-safe <br /> shutdown?* ❑ Yes 0 No ®NA C3Yes❑No ®NA E] Yes❑No ®NA <br /> Was fail-safe verified to be ❑Yes ❑No ®NA ❑ Yes❑ No RNA ❑ Yes❑No MNA <br /> operational?' <br /> Wait time between applying <br /> pressure/vacuum/water and starting 30 minutes 30 minutes 30 minutes <br /> test: <br /> Test Start Time: 1:05 pin <br /> I Initial Reading(R,): 2.0439 <br /> Test End Time: 1:20 pm <br /> Final Reading(Rr): 2.0421 <br /> Test Duration: 1S min <br /> Change in Reading(RF-Rj): -0.0018 <br /> Pass/FaiI Threshold or Criteria: +/-0.002" <br /> Test Result: 0 Pass ❑ Fail ❑Pass IE Fail ❑Pass © Fail <br /> Was sensor removed for testing? ®Yes❑No❑NA ❑Yes❑No ®NA ❑Yes❑No®NA <br /> Was sensor properly replaced and M Yes❑No❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ®NA Q Yes❑No®NA <br /> verified functional after testin ? <br /> Comments—(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-rip for failed tests) <br /> "Sensor functionality was not confirmed. This procedure is not part of the Secondary Containment testing scope or work". <br /> Replaced torn test boots. 89 and 91 still failing. Possible penetration boots <br /> ' If the entire depth of the sump is not tested,specify how much was tested_ if the answer to aM of the questions indicated with an <br /> • . ... ........ ..�,... .. .. ... __�.. _---� ice__ n�tmnn � r �in� <br /> TOTAL P.05 <br />