COMPLIANCE INFO 2010 - 2012 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MAY-28-2010 19:53 Service Station Systems 488 938 8888 P.04 10. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps ❑ l Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present,but were Not Tested [J i Test Method Developed By: ❑ Sump Manufacturer ® Industry Standard p Professional Engineer ❑ Other(Specify) Test Method Used: ❑ Pressure ❑ Vacuum M Hydrostatic (Specify) [I Otho Test Equipment Used: Incon Sump Tester Equipment Resolution: +1-0.002" Fill Sump#87 Fill Sump#89 Fill Sump#91 Sump Diameter: 44" 44" 44" Sump Depth: 56" 56" j 56" Height from Tank Top to Top of N/A N/A j N/A Highest Piping Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest 20" 15" l5" Electrical Penetration: Condition of sump prior to Good Good Good testing: Portion of Sum Tested 2"above piping 2"above 21ping 2"above piping Sump Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass _ Wait time between applying presst►re/vacuum/water and 30 minutes I 30 minutes 30 minutes starting test: -- Test Start Tune: 8:05 am 8:05 am 8:05 am Initial Reading(R,): 4.0222 2.4762 4.6622 Test End Time: 8:20 am 8:20 am 8:20 atn Final Reading(R,,): 4.02172.4761 4.6622 Test Duration: ! 15 min. 15 min. 15 min. Change in Reading Rr-R,): -0.0005 -0.0001 None Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: +/-0.002" +/-0.002" +/-0.002" Test Result: El Pass C Fail El Pass ❑Fail © Pass ❑ Fail i Is there a sensor in the sump? ® Yes ❑No ® Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑No Does the sensor alarm when either product or water is ! ❑Yes Q No M NA ❑Yes ❑No ®NA ❑ Yes❑No ®NA detected? _ Was sensor removed for testing? ® Yes❑No ❑NA ®Yes❑No ❑NA ® Yes ❑ No ONA Was sensor properly replaced and M Yes❑No ❑NA 0 Yes ❑No [INA ® Yes❑No CINA verified functional after testing? I Comments— (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-u ror foiled tests "Sensor functionality was not confirmed. This procedure is not part of the Secondary Containment testing scope of work".