Laserfiche WebLink
S A N d OA Q U l N Environmental Health Department <br /> —COUNTY— <br /> Aboveground Petroleum Storage Act Inspection Report <br /> Facility Name: Facility Address: Oat.: <br /> CONCRETE INC 24717 E BRANDT RD LODI Aril 23 2019 <br /> Other violations <br /> 4010 See below Unlisted Admminrauonloocumentanon violation .V .R .COS <br /> 4030 See below Unlisted Training violation In In In COS <br /> 4030 See bel ow Un listed OperationarMamtenance H olanon C d nCOS <br /> 4000 See bel ow Un listed Rel easeiseakslSpi Its vl cation In In In COS <br /> 4050 See below Unlisted AbandonmenVlllegal Dlsposallunauthorized Treatment violation .V .R .COS <br /> seallilles SUMMARY OF VIOLATIONS <br /> (CLASS I,CLASS II,or MINOR-Notice t, Comply) <br /> Item N Remarks <br /> 301 CFR 112.5(a)Failed to amend Plan as necessary. <br /> The SPCC plan describes secondary containment for the mobile refueler as a shallow membrane.Facility personnel <br /> were not able to describe what this was and stated that secondary containment for the mobile refueler was different <br /> than what was described in the SPCC plan. The Spill Prevention,Control, and Countermeasure(SPCC)Plan must <br /> be amended when there is a change in the facility design,construction,operation,or maintenance that materially <br /> affects its potential for a discharge,within 6 months of the change,and implemented as soon as possible,not later <br /> than 6 months following preparation of the amendment. Immediately make all necessary amendments to the SPCC <br /> Plan to accurately represent the procedures and policies currently in place at the facility. <br /> This is a minor violation. <br /> 602 CFR 112.7(ax2)Plan failed to discuss equivalent environmental protection, if applicable. <br /> The Spill Prevention,Control, and Countermeasure(SPCC)failed to discuss alternative environmental protection <br /> requirements in detail.The SPCC plan mentions the Steel Stank Institute(STI)SP-001 industry standard and provides <br /> an inspection frequency table from the STI-SP-001 standard.The SPCC plan deviates from the requirements of the STI <br /> SP-001 standard,it does not mention annual inspections or formal inspections as defined by the STI standard. The <br /> SPCC plan states that the tanks are not integrity tested and that visual inspections conducted by the facility meet the <br /> environmental equivalence of CFR section 112.8(c)(6).The SPCC plan does not discuss the reasons for <br /> noncomformance. If the SPCC Plan does not conform to the applicable requirements,you must state the reasons for <br /> non-conformance in your Plan and describe in detail alternate methods and how you will achieve equivalent <br /> environmental protection.. Immediately amend the SPCC Plan to include a discussion of equivalent environmental <br /> protection. <br /> Note: If an owner or operator deviates from applicable industry standards to develop an integrity testing program,then <br /> a PE must certify an environmentally equivalent alternative in the SPCC Plan.The Plan must provide the reason for the <br /> deviation,describe the alternative approach,and explain how it achieves environmental protection equivalent to the <br /> applicable industry standard. <br /> This is a Class II violation. <br /> FA0010199 FIC51559]SO001 0@32019 <br /> EHD1801 R-09crFMIS Fag.4ofa Abavegrmnd F..-.Same,AC OR <br /> 1868 E. Hazelton Avenue I Stockton,California 95205 1 T 209 468-3420 1 F 209 464-0138 1 www.sjcehd.com <br />