Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Nathan Esformes -2- 28 Nbvember 1995 <br /> Condor used the results of the DHS report to estimate how much chloroform a single swimming pool <br /> would discharge annually to the soil, assuming the average of 51 ppb chloroform concentration and that <br /> 150 gallons of pool water are back-flushed to the surrounding soils twice per year during pool <br /> maintenance. Under these assumptions, Condor estimated that one swimming pool would discharge <br /> 57,916 4g of chloroform annually to the soil. <br /> One source of error in this estimate is the assumption that chloroform concentrations in public pools are <br /> reflective of chloroform concentrations in private pools. It is likely that less chlorine is needed for <br /> maintaining a private pool than a public pool. The limited data from the two private outdoor pools in <br /> the Triple E area suggests that pools north of MW-7 may not contribute as much chloroform to the soils <br /> and ground water as the estimate of 57,916,cg, which is based on data from public pools. <br /> Even assuming the estimate accurately reflects conditions north of MW-7, 57,916 /.zg of chloroform <br /> discharged annually from each swimming pool would not increase chloroform concentrations in ground <br /> water significantly. Assuming all of the chloroform was able to migrate to the ground water annually, <br /> the aquifer is 20 feet thick (the length of the screened interval), and there are 14 swimming pools each <br /> contributing 57,916 µg chloroform annually to the ground water over an area of 1,200 feet (the distance <br /> north from MW-7 of the 14 pools) by 2,545 feet (the distance between MacArthur Drive and Fair Oaks <br /> Road), it would only result in 0.0011 �tg/l chloroform in ground water. This is insignificant compared <br /> to the maximum level of 43 ,ug/l chloroform detected in MW-7. <br /> Septic tanks <br /> The report states septic systems are a potential source of trihalomethane compounds in ground water <br /> since all of the residences north of MW-7 are on private septic systems and because chlorinated <br /> compounds may be discharged to the soil from septic system leach lines. There is no reason to suspect <br /> that chlorinated compounds are discharged to private septic systems in amounts that would result in <br /> significant concentrations of chloroform in the ground water. <br /> Community Water Supply <br /> At the 7 July 1995 ineeting between Triple E representatives and our staff, Triple E representatives <br /> stated that none of the domestic wells downgradient of MW-7 is currently being used since all of these <br /> residents are now using a chlorinated community water supply. However, as the report states, only <br /> residents of Maurland Manor are connected to the community well system, while the other residents <br /> north of MW-7 still use private wells. Therefore, the source and concentrations of the chloroform in the <br /> ground water north of MW-7 are still a concern. <br /> The report also provides information showing that none of the wells which supply water to Maurland <br /> Manor have had detectable concentrations of chloroform, even though water from these wells is <br /> occasionally chlorinated. Since the water is used only at Maurland Manor, which is approximately <br /> 2,800 feet north (downgradient) of MW-7, chloroform concentrations in ground water immediately <br /> downgradient of MW-7 would not be impacted by this water. <br /> Need for Additional Monitoring Wells North of MW--7 <br /> As we have stated in the past, the extent of chloroform contamination north of MW-7 has not been <br /> determined. The information presented in the report does not support Triple E's conclusion that <br />