Laserfiche WebLink
r. �}. f...w.:a I, l.. q•'" <br /> }i IA III{ <br /> ,The BTEX=compound ethylbenzene,was'detected in well MW-9'with at'a concentration of 9.3 <br /> g, a , y,, `' p 6{ 2 a <br /> The:followin chlorinated h drocarbon com ounds we ..e a ected: cis 1 2=dichloaoethene cis=1; <br /> DCE)•was'detected in samples,MW-6.and MW-10 at concentrations of•.770 µg01 and 1,200,µg/l, <br /> -respectively; 1,2=DCA was detected in sample MW-9 ai'aconcentration of 2$ µg11;tetrachloroethene ,,i <br /> (PCE)was.reported iri samples MW-4,MW-6,MW-7 and'MW-10 at a maximum concentration of' <br /> 570. µg/1 (MW-10); trichloroethene (TCE) was reported'in samples-,MW-6. and MW-10 at a <br /> maximum'concentration of 500µg/l(MW=10);vinyl chloride was reported in samples MW-3,MW=' <br /> 6 and MW-10 at amaximuin concentration of 170µg11(MW=40);'and 1,1;1;2-tetrachloroethane and <br /> 1�:4-dichlorobenzene were detected-,in sample MW- -9 at'14"µg11 and.4'.0:µg11, respectively: <br /> . . <br /> ,,Additional VOCs detected in the samples analyzed included'-napthalene"in samples'MW-3,MW=9' <br /> and MW. 40 at a maximum concentration of 140"4g/1 (MW-9); ,isopropylbenzene and, n-.' ', <br /> propylbenzene in samples MW-3 and MW-9'at maximum concentrations of 80µg/l(MW-3)and 150 <br /> pg/l (MW-3 and MW-9), respectively;• and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene in sample MW-9 at -a <br /> concentration-of 6.0 µg/1. <br /> ' A map of dissolved TPH-ss and VOCs is depicted in'Figure 2. Analytical results--for"chlorinateds <br /> hydrocarbon compounds in ground:water samples are summarized in Tables 2 and 3.The laboratory ` <br /> report,(CalTech Lab Nos. 0209-111-1 to 0209-111 8) for'September, QA/QC report and.chain-of <br /> ' custody fomri are,incl"uded in Apperidix-B. <br />' ' • 4,0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION <br /> ' Based upon the results of the investigation, AGE concluded that: <br /> • Ground water depths within-the established monitoring wells were,between 24.97 and <br /> 26.57 feet.below the tops of the well casings; ground water flow-direction was northeast at <br />•' a gradient of approximately 0.0015 feet/feet.Historically,the ground watefflow dominantly . <br /> has been between north-northwest and`northeast. <br /> Monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-5 at or near the site are"drowned"with well screen. <br /> intervals as much as 10 feet"below,present groundwater surface.-Samples'collected from <br /> 'these wells may not be fully representative of ground water conditions at or near the top of <br /> the saturated soil zone or capillary'zone, where the greatest hydrocarbon impact to ground ; <br /> .water is often encountered.'The more recently installed wells were screened across the <br /> current water table level.Note that wells MW-8 andMW-9 are located near wells MW-1 and ' <br /> ' MW-2. <br /> • TPH-ss was detected in the on-site monitoring wells MW-3, MW-6, MW=7 and MW-9 as <br /> ' well as off-site well MW-10.' <br /> The BTEXcompound"'ethylbenzene was detected in on-site well MW-9 at'a concentration. h <br /> of 9.3 lig/l. <br /> ~Detected concentrations of PCE in`samples,MW-4,MW-6,MW-7 and MW-10`and TCE in <br /> samples MW-6 and MW-101exceeded the DHS' Maximum Contaminant Levels(MCLS) in <br />