Laserfiche WebLink
-;.• -r, «K .,. � i I T r '+�-� + + i s + ''n- ' •- psi. k �'..• * . <br /> .�- .+ ` ' � -t ! 1 9,y , +, a4 et.o i�l 7• in 1 t4 r ''s" ryi f1'. <br /> 24.Januaryj <br /> AGE NC:.Project No 95 0114 <br /> r r• Page 6 of 6 ; <br /> 5 2: 'PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON=IMPACTED GROUND .WATER 'a <br /> Based upon the-analytical:Tesults'.of ground''•wafei samples, the horizontal_exteri# of hydrocarbon- <br /> irnpactM ground water'has'defined north and east of.the, site..However; 'liydrocarbon-irnpacted:, <br />{, r water°ma extend south of ro ert' :: We:reconnmehd the'installation of one additional kr <br /> ground - y p. P Y <br /> ground water"monitonng'rwell south,of the former•UST excavation.' '. <br /> Ifiemediation ofhydrocarbon-impacted ground water is:required;"feasibility studies4will have ta,be <br /> -to deterrYiirie acceptable remedial options the site. .l'Ve:recornmend the installation of'at least one: <br /> in-situ air sparging{IAS)well and performance of anT�S'pilot test. The IAS well.should�be in"stalled <br /> at_the same time as the SVE wells.,Ground water;samples 'h.60d,also undergo..microbiological <br /> analysis,to 'determine bioremediation feasibility at the,site Results of the.pilot'studies should be.,. <br /> t , included in a CAP. <br /> G.O.. LIMI-TATIONS <br /> Our professional services were`performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised-b' <br /> I*"- ' environmental consultants'practicing in this or similar localities.;Thefindings:were mainly-based•on <br /> analytical results provided by-an independent laboratory. Evaluations of hydrogeologic conditions at <br /> the site for the purpose.of this investigation'are nmade.from a limited number of data points'{i,e. soil. <br /> ' <br /> samples ' monitoring wells);and subsurface conditions ma}'wary away from these points. No other' <br /> warranty, expressed or.i;riplied, is made as to'the professional recommendations contained in this'. <br /> '; report. <br />