Laserfiche WebLink
Blockbuster Vdeo/Yellow Submarine November 24, 1992 <br /> Monitoring Well Installation Page 5 <br /> 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations <br /> The amount and extent of contamination encountered in MW-4 was completely <br /> unforeseen. The contaminant plume in the re-excavation was pinching out rapidly at <br /> the bottom and side of the excavation and MW-1, just twenty feet to the west of MW- <br /> 4, had no contamination. <br /> ' Because the plume of contamination in the re-excavation was so small and was rapidly <br /> diminishing, it is not reasonable to assume that the MW-4 contamination originated <br /> from that source. In addition, the MW-4 contamination extends to a higher elevation <br /> than that last seen in the re-excavation. Therefore, it is probable that another source is <br /> responsible for the contamination found in MW-4. <br /> ' During the remedial excavations which were conducted on the site, pipes were <br /> encountered that extended out beneath the sidewalk on the north boundary of the <br /> ' property in the vicinity of MW-4. It was thought at that time that the pipe run may <br /> have indicated that an old underground storage tank was present out beneath Ilarding <br /> Avenue. The discovery of contamination increasing in intensity and extent toward <br /> Harding Avenue lends credence to the presence of a tank beneath the street. <br /> The water table is presently at a depth of approximately 53 feet below surface and the <br /> ' closest contamination encountered in MW-4 lies at approximately 36 feet below <br /> surface, a separation of 17 feet. The groundwater is presently not contaminated, and <br /> the threat of contamination at present is low because of the impermeable character of <br /> ' the upper clay unit. <br /> ' However, at the present time, the water table is depressed because of the six years of <br /> drought that California has experienced. If the rainfall levels return to normal, the <br /> standing water level (piezometric surface) will rise at the site. Although the historic <br /> elevation of groundwater in this area is somewhat in question, it is clear that thef <br /> ' standing water level will approach that of the zone of contamination in MW-4. <br /> Nevertheless, even in the event of a higher standing water level, it is believed that the <br /> ' risk of groundwater contamination is .low. This is because of the fact that the <br /> contamination is enclosed within a unit of plastic clay of low permeability and there <br /> does not appear to be any secondary permeability induced by root casts above a depth <br /> ' of 50 feet. The clay unit is, in effect, an aquatard and does not conduct groundwater <br /> flow. <br /> ' If a higher level of standing water is achieved in the future, it will be an-artesian <br /> system. Water will rise to the piezometric surface only when the clay unit is penetrated <br /> by a boring and water in the aquifer at a depth of 53 feet is allowed to rise up into the <br /> 1 � <br /> e <br />