Laserfiche WebLink
1 1 <br /> � 1 <br /> � I 1 <br /> ` I <br /> 11 1 <br /> 11 r r 1 n <br /> 06 August 2003 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0144 <br /> ' Page 2 of 5 <br /> I <br /> ' On 08 April 2003, depth to'water was measured In the fifteen ground water monitoring wells at the <br /> site, and ground water samples were collected from each well, In accordance with the revised <br /> monitoring schedule established at a 25 September 2002 meeting with the EHD <br /> 21 WELL MONITORING AND PURGING <br /> ' ed to measure the depth to round water in fifteen monitoring <br /> , <br /> A Solxnst water level meter was used p g g ' <br /> wells at the subject site relative to the tops of the well casings The ground water elevation, flow <br /> direction and hydraulic gradient were determined from these data(Table 1) <br /> 1 <br /> ' After depth to water measurements were recorded, wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-4, MW-5, MW-11, <br /> MW-12, MW-13, MW-18, MW-19A/B, MW-20A/B and MW-21A/13 were purged using new, <br /> disposable plastic bailers, monitoring well MW-8 was purged using a Waters inertial pump <br /> ' equipped with 518" tubing and a check valve Approximately three casing-water volumes of water <br /> (approximately 8 75 to 50 gallons) were removed from the purged wells Wells MW-19A and <br /> MW-20A were'balled dry prior to removing three casing-water volumes Temperature, pH and <br /> i l ls 'conductivity of purged water were measured at regular purge-volume,intervals using an Oakton <br /> water analyzer The recorded field data and logs are Included In Appendix A All purged water was <br /> stored In 55-gallon DOT-approved drums on-site <br /> 1 ` 1 <br /> 22 COLLECTION OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> 1 1 f Water samples were collected from each purged monitoring well using new disposable bailers after <br /> allowing the wells to,achleve a minimum 80% recovery of the pre-purge water volume Samples <br /> ' were transferred into 40-m1 EPA-approved VOA vials,containing 0 5 ml 18%hydrochloric acid as <br /> a sample preservative and into 1-liter amber bottles without preservative The samples were labeled, <br /> stored on ice and transported under chain-of-custody to McCampbell Analytical, Inc (MAI), a <br /> ' California Department of Health Services (DHS)-certified analytical laboratory Each sample was <br /> analyzed for <br /> ' • TPH-g, TPH-d and TPH-mo In accordance with EPA Methods 5030/8015 and 3550/8015, <br /> respectively, <br /> r <br /> • BTEX In accordance with EPA Method 8260B and <br /> The fuel additives di-isopropyl ether (DIPS), ethyl tertiary-butyl ether (ETBE), methyl <br /> tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE), tertiary-amyl methyl ether, tertiary-butyl alcohol, <br /> ' 1,2-dfbromoethane (EDB) and 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) in accordance with EPA <br /> . Method 8260B <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />