My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001839
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHEROKEE
>
521
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544430
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001839
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2019 2:28:44 PM
Creation date
5/7/2019 2:20:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0001839
RECORD_ID
PR0544430
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0005370
FACILITY_NAME
PARMAR TEXACO
STREET_NUMBER
521
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
CHEROKEE
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
521 N CHEROKEE LN
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PRODUCT RECOVERY TEST <br /> On September 20, 1994, the free product (FP) layer was removed from MW-3 by bailing approximately <br /> 5 gallons of water/FP from the well. After removal the recovery of the FP layer was monitored by <br /> measuring the FP thickness at 5 minute intervals for the first hour and 15 minute intervals for the second <br /> hour. No measurable recovery was observed during the test. The water/FP was transported immediately <br /> to the Ramos Environmental facility in West Sacramento, California for recycling. <br /> CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based on the data supplied within this QSR <br /> * It appears that MW-1 is not functioning properly and needs to be properly destroyed. The necessity <br /> to replacement the well may be determined after the hydropunch data has been collected and <br /> reviewed <br /> * Additional QA/QC tests should be performed to establish a consistent laboratory <br /> * Removal of the FP layer by bailing should be the most cost effective option. Removal will be <br /> performed concurrently with other site progress (e.g drilling) or at least quarterly <br /> LIMITATIONS <br /> The collection of subsurface information is an inexact science. The preferred methods used to collect <br /> subsurface data should be expected to vary between different consultants. Furthermore, the methods used <br /> by the same consultant should be expected to change based on site conditions and technological advances <br /> This workplan represents a professional opinion based on the data provided in the reports cited earlier <br /> This work plan does not represent this professional's opinion regarding the total scope of work which may <br /> need to be performed to fully assess and/or remediate this site. No warranty is expressed or implied. No <br /> portion of this work plan may be used in any form or for any purpose without the prior written consent <br /> of its author <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.