Laserfiche WebLink
' 3.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING <br /> 3I-1 Field Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling <br />' Groundwater monitoring wells for the former Parmar Texaco site( PT-MW 1 to 6) were probed <br /> for water depth on December S, 2005 The six wells were probed for depth to groundwater <br /> surface, presence of free-floating product, and depth to bottom of well The wells were sampled <br />' in accordance with the PHSEHD approved site characterization workplan (Muir, 2003) using <br /> groundwater monitoring procedures outlined in Appendix 1. <br />' The wells were initially inspected for integrity and general maintenance conditions with the <br /> findings reported on the Well Development/Purging Worksheets provided in Appendix 2 <br /> Initially,the static water level was measured with an electronic water level indicator that allowed <br /> measurement of depth to approximately 0 01 foot The water level below casing and total depth <br /> of each well monitored were recorded on individual Well Development/Purging Worksheets <br />' (Appendix 2). The groundwater surface elevation was then calculated in feet, mean sea level <br /> along with total volumes to be removed prior to well sampling <br /> A clear, acrylic bailer was then used to visually inspect an undisturbed sample from the top of the <br /> water column to determine if a product layer or sheen was present A slight but pronounced <br /> sheen and product layer was visible on the tape and bailers used to sample monitoring wells PT- <br /> MW 1, 2 and 3 These wells had a slight, free-product layer on top of the groundwater surface <br /> approximately 0 005 foot thick No product layer or sheen was visible in the bailers used for the <br /> other monitoring wells <br /> A mnumum of three well casing volumes were extracted from each monitoring well using a <br /> Teflon bailer and/or submersible 15" diameter pump. This allowed a representative groundwater <br /> sample to flow from the reservoir area surrounding each wellbore into the wellbore. This effort <br /> is consistent with groundwater monitoring well sampling guidelines established by the RWQCB <br /> for petroleum hydrocarbon site investigations. <br /> Field parameters (pH,temperature, electrical conductivity(Ec) were measured and recorded on <br /> individual well field worksheets during the water purged from each monitoring well. Results are <br /> summarized on the attached Tables 1 and 2 Purged water was placed into a 55-gallon drum <br /> onsite that had been labeled as non-hazardous <br /> Groundwater samples were collected using a disposable Teflon bailer and placed into 40 ml <br /> VOA sample containers that had been prepared with a dilute HCl solution for sample <br /> preservation and labeled The water samples were handled and transported under accepted chain <br /> of custody procedures outlined in the workplan to Kiff Analytical Laboratories, Davis, <br /> California After sampling activities were concluded each of the wells were then secured <br /> All sampling equipment was decontaminated by Ai uinox and followup distilled water rinse <br /> IMainlD\Eewonm=W\Pazmaffcxwo\Rq)mU\QM P-0123105 wo 4 <br />