My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VICTOR
>
880
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0503634
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2019 4:40:56 PM
Creation date
5/7/2019 4:15:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0503634
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0005914
FACILITY_NAME
VICTOR ROAD SHELL
STREET_NUMBER
880
STREET_NAME
VICTOR
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
04905032
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
880 VICTOR RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
275
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LLISTLine Bulletin 43 • Mach 2003 <br /> ■MTBE Acid Hydrolysis To very briefly summarize their a*any potential limitations to that <br /> from page 19 results, using the standards of U.S. data.That information should serve <br /> EPA's performance evaluation proto- you well,and your corrective action <br /> col criteria, all three labs performed decision-making should improve. <br /> A Multi-Lab Performance within acceptable limits of accuracy However,at most sites you prob- <br /> Study Validation of Methods and precision for all four compounds ably do not need to use a heated P&T <br /> 5030/8260 for the entire range of concentrations extraction to generate good data for <br /> As mentioned earlier,the recent arti- studies (i.e., 1 to 3,000µg/L).MTBE MTBE and TBA.If heating is shown <br /> ides <br /> and TBA recoveries were almost to improve method performance, <br /> ves Evans and Colsman an excellent summary <br /> of pro- always within the acceptable range then temperatures of 40°to 45°C are <br /> study that addresses many of thea <br /> v (i.e., between 75 and 125 percent likely to be sufficient, and at these <br /> issues raised about the data quality recovery). In all cases, the desired temperatures, MTBE hydrolysis <br /> provided by P&T/GC-MS analysis. low ppb detection limits were should not compromise data quality. <br /> The authors note that the U.S. EPA reached. Purge-and-trap extraction of water <br /> Office of Solid Waste is a strong The authors conclude that the samples at ambient or slightly ele- <br /> advocate of performance-based ana- results reflect a successful demon- vated temperatures (combined with <br /> lytical methodology, which is a stration of method applicability good calibration procedures)should <br /> requirement for several RCRA pro- (P&T/GC-MS) for the compounds adequately recover any TBA present <br /> grams. Briefly defined, "the perfor- studied. This single study of three in samples. <br /> mance-based approach requires that labs does not, of course, mean that Furthermore, it is probably <br /> methods be selected and approved each and every one of the almost unnecessary in most situations to use <br /> based upon their ability to meet the 1,000 environmental labs nationwide TSP as your field preservative, <br /> data quality goals of a given project routinely performs as well.However, instead of acid.While both low acid- <br /> in the actual matrix to be sampled." the authors conclude, "The re- ity (pH) and high temperature are <br /> (Readers looking for more informa- sults...appear to be a successful known to enhance the rates of MTBE <br /> tion this topic are referred to EPA's demonstration...that...purge-and-trap hydrolysis,an evaluation of these fac- <br /> site at:httpd/www.epa.gov/epaoswer/ GC-MS is an acceptable technology tors and a review of the standard <br /> hazwaste/test/pbms.hbn. for the analysis of MTBE and its oxy- analytical procedures employed at <br /> The authors compared the per- genated breakdown products." many commercial laboratories indi- <br /> formance of three different California There is a lot of other good infor- cate that it is unlikely that significant <br /> commercial labs for MTBE and TBA mation and discussion in that well- MTBE hydrolysis occurs.For condi- <br /> that use routine P&T/GC-MS analy- written article, and I strongly tions used at most UST release sites— <br /> sis. They wanted to make sure that encourage you to take a closer look using standard acid preservation of <br /> the data they were collecting for their for yourself. It provides a good tem- samples, followed by P&T/GC-MS <br /> site (the world-famous Port Huen- plate for the kind of information you extraction and analysis—hydrolysis <br /> eme)would be adequate to quantify should be able to obtain from your of MTBE to TBA will be very limited <br /> MTBE at 5µg/L and TBA at 12µg/L laboratory regarding the quality of its and will not significantly influence <br /> (2-propanol and acetone were two analytical performance. data quality.Hydrolysis of MTBE to <br /> other target analytes). TBA should not be a concern during <br /> The authors do not indicate that With Good Data and storage and analysis of acid-pre- <br /> they had concerns regarding possible Attention to Protocol... served samples. <br /> hydrolysis of MTBE to TBA,but they We know a lot more today than we Data users should have a good <br /> do note that some critics question the did a few years back about the proper understanding of the basic perfor- <br /> purging efficiency of these methods approaches for oxygenate analysis. mance of the sampling and analytical <br /> for nonpolar compounds like MTBE We also know a lot about MTBE acid procedures they use to generate oxy- <br /> and especially TBA. hydrolysis and its potential effects on genate data. If they have concerns <br /> They submitted a variety of Port groundwater analysis,but that's not about data quality for ongoing evalu- <br /> Hueneme groundwater samples to to say we know it all. I suspect that ations of corrective action at UST <br /> the three labs(concentrations ranged this topic will continue to be of high sites where gasoline oxygenates are <br /> from 1 µg/L to about 3,000 µg/L in interest and that we will learn a lot present in groundwater,they should <br /> the samples submitted to each lab) more in the coming year. review the protocols in use,the list of <br /> and asked them to run their standard The studies cited in this article target oxygenate analytes, and their <br /> method. Two labs used EPA 5030 / and in LL#42 collectively provide a performance criteria(e.g.,recoveries <br /> 8260 and one used EPA 5242, a simi- lot of interesting information, but and detection limits)to determine if <br /> lar P&T/GC-MS method. All three more information will be required to any changes might improve perfor- <br /> labs used a purge cycle of 11 minutes. conclusively document the perfor- mance.I would also recommend that <br /> Two labs purged at ambient tempera- mance of the analytical methods cur- you talk about these issues with some <br /> ture,and the other used 40°C.A vari- rently in common use. To be sure, of the commercial labs in your area to <br /> ety of quality assurance and quality following the recommended protocol determine what they think are the <br /> control procedures were also provided in LL#42 would help you best approaches to maintaining or <br /> employed to confirm method perfor- become more aware of the quality of improving data quality.■ <br /> mance. the data for the sites you manage, <br /> 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.