Laserfiche WebLink
Octa6er 2002 • LUSTLine Bulletin 42 <br /> Tablol EFFECT OF r r HYDROLYSIS r 800 present in the sample and that the <br /> higher concentrations of TBA in the <br /> Time of Incubation Percent MTBE undiluted samples were produced by <br /> Preserved with (minutes) MTBE(pg/L) TBA(pg/L) Hydrolyzed hydrolysis of MTBE. <br /> In 15 undiluted samples,the frac- <br /> pH-1 30 195 2HCL o 536 55 57 tion of MTBE that was hydrolyzed <br /> 5 <br /> so 88 5 343 77% during analysis varied from 22 per- <br /> cent to 89 percent, with a median of <br /> HCl 0 495 <3 62 percent hydrolyzed.The hydroly- <br /> pH=2 30 401 25.2 6.1% sis of MTBE in the unsamdiluted les <br /> _. -- — - _60 :; u _ 393. '_ 53.8 _. 130% P <br /> 1%trisodmm o 476 3. increased the reported concentration <br /> phosphate 30 424 <31 <br /> 1% of TBA by a factor of four to eight. <br /> H>12 60 432 <3 <1% When samples that were diluted 1:10 <br /> 'The hydrolysis of 1 pg/L of MTBE should yield 0.84 pg/L of TBA. are compared to samples that were <br /> diluted 1:100,the extent of hydrolysis <br /> in the samples that were diluted 1:10 <br /> Table EFFECT OF rHYDROCHLORICr varied from 1 percent to 18 percent <br /> with an average of about 9 percent. <br /> ON r CONCENTRATION OF These data-quality problems <br /> TBA(pg/L) MTBE (pg/L) associated with the hydrolysis of <br /> corrected for corrected for Percent MTBE MTBE to TBA illustrate the impor- <br /> Sample ID Dilution dilution dilution Hydrolyzed tance of a quality assurance/quality <br /> control program. Any significant <br /> ML-12-16 none 3,230 89% hydrolysis of MTBE can be detected <br /> t10 toss 653 easily if matrix spike samples are <br /> included in the analyses. The accu- <br /> ML-16-12 none 10.400 83% Aj racy of the analysis is determined by <br /> 1:10 2,644 5.8% measuring the concentration of the <br /> tto0 2,006 12666 target compound present in a sam- <br /> ple,then adding a known concentra- <br /> ML-17-12 none 6.170 56% tion of the target compound to a <br /> 110 1,493 0.7% replicate sample of the same water(a <br /> 00 Aos 73,273 matrix spike)and again determining <br /> the concentration of the target com- <br /> ML-19-12 none 4,640 _ pound. The concentration in the <br /> 1:10 1,309 - _ matrix spike sample should equal the <br /> sum of the spiked concentration and <br /> 1:100 591 7,216 the original concentration. <br /> ML-19-16 none 6,100 _ 68% Therefore, if water samples are <br /> 110 1222 7.3% 1 preserved with acid, there is an <br /> understandable concern as to <br /> 1 1 n0 _ 740 8,551 whether or not any of these data are <br /> ML-z3-ts none 719 valid. Unfortunately, the answer to <br /> 110 260 2 550 this can only be determined by <br /> _ _ reviewing the reports of analytical <br /> results from each site of interest.The <br /> and shipped to EPA's R.S.Kerr Envi- preservative was diluted tenfold, the things to look for are indications <br /> ronmental Research Center for analy- rate of acid hydrolysis of MTBE was of sample-preservation methods, <br /> sis using a static headspace sampler reduced tenfold, and the concentra- method operating parameters,qual- <br /> (Method 5021). tion of TBA produced from hydroly- ity assurance/quality control results, <br /> The water samples were brought sis was reduced. The reported and whether or not confirmatory <br /> to 80°C for 30 minutes prior to analy- concentrations in Table 2 are cor- identification of analytes is provided. <br /> sis of the headspace by GC/MS. rected for dilution of the sample.The The rate constants published by <br /> Replicates of selected groundwater reported concentration of TBA in the O'Reilly et al. (2001) can be used to <br /> samples were diluted and then ana- undiluted samples was much higher estimate the stability of MTBE in <br /> lyzed. The concentration of TBA than in the diluted samples. water samples. Figure 1 (page 6)pre- <br /> reported for a sample was the sum of The last column in Table 2 pre- sents predictions for water samples <br /> the concentration of TBA that was sents the fraction of MTBE that was that are preserved at pH=1 and <br /> originally present plus the concentra- hydrolyzed during analysis.The frac- pH=2 and stored before analysis at <br /> tion of TBA produced from hydroly- tion was calculated by assuming that temperatures of V C, 10°C, and 200 <br /> sis of MTBE. the reported concentration of TBA at C.If the samples were refrigerated at <br /> For each tenfold dilution, the the highest dilution was the true con- 10'C or lower, less than 5 percent of <br /> concentration of acid used as a centration of TBA that was originally ■continued on page 6 <br /> 5 <br />