Laserfiche WebLink
4.0 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION <br /> 4.1 SOIL BORINGS AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS <br /> Two vertical soil borings (SB-1 and SB-2) were advanced to depths of 51.5 feet bgs onsite <br /> on November 21 and December 2, 1996. The purpose of SB-2, that is located near SB-1, <br /> was to obtain more reasonable SPT blow counts under the groundwater table for the <br /> geotechnical engineering evaluations. The results of the geotechnical evaluations are <br /> presented under separate cover. <br /> A hydropunch water sample was collected from soil boring SB-1. Three vertical soil borings <br /> were drilled to depths of 25 to 27 feet bgs and converted to groundwater monitoring wells <br /> j (MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3). The borings and wells were drilled with an 8- to 10-inch hollow- <br /> stem auger drill rig. Boring locations are indicated on Figure 3. The borings and wells were <br /> logged and samples were collected by SECOR personnel. The boring and well logs are <br /> 7 presented in Appendix B. <br /> 4.2 SOIL SAMPLING AND PACKAGING <br /> Drive samples were obtained from the borings by driving a Standard Penetration Test Split <br /> Spoon Sampler (SPT) lined with three 6-inch long brass sampling tubes. The sampler was <br /> driven by a 140-pound hammer, free-falling 30 inches. The sampler was advanced 18 inches <br /> at each sampling interval or until refusal, and the blow counts required to advance the <br /> sampler each 6-inch interval of the 18-inch drive were recorded on the boring logs. Sampler <br /> refusal is when the sampler does not advance and appears to bounce when the hammer is <br /> lowered. Typically, if a 6-inch interval has more than 50 blows per 6 inches, the hammering <br /> is terminated. The blow counts may be correlated to soil consistency and other engineering <br /> properties. <br /> Relatively undisturbed soil samples were collected at approximately 5-foot depth intervals. <br /> Prior to sampling at each interval, the sampler and the brass insert tubes were cleaned in an <br /> J Alconox scrub solution, rinsed with tap water, and rinsed a second time in distilled water. <br /> J This rigorous cleaning procedure was followed to avoid cross-contamination. Of the three <br /> brass sleeves, one brass sleeve from each sample drive was evaluated for the presence of <br /> J petroleum hydrocarbons in the field by detectable odors and by using an Hnu PI-101 <br /> -+ Photoionization Detector (PID); and one brass sleeve soil sample was then packaged by <br /> affixing Teflon sheets on the top and bottom of the sample tube, capping the tube and <br /> sealing with Teflon tape. The samples were placed in refrigerated storage and delivered <br /> under chain-of-custody to Del Mar Analytical Laboratory in Colton, California for testing. <br /> ]N 40007-097-01 <br /> 4-1 <br />