Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> LTABLE 5 COMPARISON OF THE EXCAVATED VERSES THE RESIDUAL CONTAMINATED SOIL <br /> SAMPLE ID SOEL PILE TPHd AVERAGE TPHd ESTIMATED SOIL ESTMATED MASS <br />' NO. (ppm) CONCENTRATION VOLUME OF S <br /> (ppm) (yam HYDROCARBONS <br /> Obs) <br />' TPHd CONTAMINATED SOIL REMOVED <br /> SPI A-D SPI 290 152 100 4104 <br />' SPI E-H 15 <br /> SP2 I-L SP2 940 622 200 335 88 <br /> SP2 M-P 1500 <br />' SP2 Q-T 5 <br /> SP2 CC-FF 42 <br /> SP3 U-X SP3 ND 6 100 1.62 <br /> SP3 Y-BB 12 <br /> SP4 GG 7J SP4 5 24 250 1620 <br />' SP4 KK-NN 5 <br /> SP4 00-RR 6.6 <br /> SP4 SS-VV 98 <br />' SP4 WW-ZZ 5.6 <br /> SPS A-D SP5 60 6 50 81 <br /> SPG I-H SP6 16 19 100 5.13 <br /> SP6I-L 21 <br /> TOTAL REMOVED 800 ydsl 40068 <br />' TPHd CONTAMINATED SOIL LEFT IN PLACE <br /> SEI-A-8.5 SIDEWALL 5.2 264 67 48 <br />' <br /> SEI-B-8 5 SAMPLES 22 <br /> SEI-D-9.0 7.1 <br /> SE1-E-9 0 9.5 <br />' SEX-C-7 5 2600 <br /> PERCENT CONTAMINATED SOIL. LEFT IN PLACE 67 yds' 11001 7.73% <br /> 867 yW <br />' PERCENT OF HYDROCARBONS LEFT IN PLACE 48 lbs 10.70:6 <br /> 448.68 lbs <br /> 1 <br /> 1 <br />