Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> construction were pursuant to standards recommended by San Joa- <br /> quin County, the State Department of Water Resources and the <br /> Regional. Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) . <br /> The wells were completed to a depth of approximately 25 feet <br /> below grade. Well completion depth was based on placement of the <br /> screened interval five feet above and fifteen feet below the <br /> M. static water Mable without penetration of any stratum of five <br /> continuous feet of relatively impermeable material encountered <br /> below the zone of saturation. <br /> The well was constructed of 2 inch diameter F480 threaded PVC <br /> screen/casing. No glues or solvents were used. Screen slot size <br /> is 0.010 inch. Sand pack material is No. 2/12 pre-washed silica <br /> �. sand. A minimum two foot bentonite seal was placed prior to <br /> grouting with a 1:1 cement-sand grout. Actual completion depths <br /> " and construction details were determined in the field based on <br /> , hydrogeologic conditions encountered and are shown on well/boring <br /> logs contained in ,Appendix 11. <br /> Drill cuttings were lagged continuously for characterization of <br /> ` contamination and soil type by an experienced staff geologist <br /> using the Unified Soil Classification System. Descriptions of <br /> soils encountered are recorded on boring/well logs and included � <br /> in Appendix II. Soil samples were collected from each boring at <br /> five foot intervals. The samples were collected using a two-inch <br /> � diameter by 18-inch long split spoon sampler lined with 6-inch <br /> long thin-walled brass tubes. The sampler was driven its entire <br /> length into undisturbed soil by a 140-pound drop hammer. Sample <br /> collection began at a depth of five feet. No samples were col- <br /> lected for laboratory analysis below the water table which was <br /> encountered at 10 feet below grade. Soil samples collected at 6 <br /> feet were submitted for laboratory analysis, due to their posi- <br /> tion above the capillary fringe. <br /> Samples were collected , preserved, and traiisported under <br /> chain-of-custody in accordance with WaterWork's Quality Assur- <br /> ance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan (Appendix III) . The samples <br /> were analyzed for benzene, toluenes, sthylbenzene, and xylenes <br /> (BTEX ) and total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPHD) by <br /> appropriate EPA and DHS methods. Applied Analytical (DHS certi- <br /> fication No. 1211 ) performed the analyse ;. <br /> Soil cuttings were placed on and covered with 6 mil plastic on- <br /> site. Soil cuttings and groundwater will be properly disposed of <br /> in a timely and appropriate manner after reviewing the analytical <br /> results and obtaining agency approval. <br /> MW2 and MW3 were moni.,ored in accordance with WaterWork 's QA/QC <br /> Plan. Su`:sequent to installation and well development, split <br /> water samples were collected from the monitoring wells MW2 and <br /> MW3 after purging a minimum of four well volumes (casing and <br /> sandpack) from each well . Stabilization of EC, pH, and tempera- <br /> ture was checked after purging and before and after sample col- <br /> lection to ensure samples collected were representative of forma- <br /> i4 <br />