Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> APPENDIX C <br /> DEMONSTRATION OF BIODEGRADATION CAPACITY <br />' This appendix describes ERM's procedures and rationale for determining if <br /> biodegradation is occurring and will continue to occur at former tank sites 1 and 2 <br />' On 22 April 1999 and 29 February 2000, ERM collected ground water samples in <br /> monitoring wells at the site to evaluate biodegradation parameters The ground water <br /> samples were analyzed for dissolved iron and dissolved manganese by USEPA Method <br /> 6010B, nitrate and sulfate by USEPA Method 300 0, and methane by USEPA Method 8015 <br /> modified Dissolved oxygen readings were also collected at each monitoring well The <br />' ground water sampling results are presented in Table C-1 Figures C-1 and C-2 present <br /> the monitoring well locations at each former tank site <br />' if biodegradation is occurring, the concentrations of electron acceptors (sulfate and <br /> nitrate) within the hydrocarbon ground water plume should be lower than those outside <br />' the hydrocarbon plume Similarly, the concentrations of metabolic byproducts (dissolved <br /> iron, dissolved manganese, and methane) should be higher in the hydrocarbon ground <br /> water plume than outside the hydrocarbon plume Finally, dissolved oxygen <br /> concentrations should be sufficient within the ground water at each tank site to allow for <br /> biodegradation to occur The results from each sampling event indicate that <br /> biodegradation is occurring at the former tank sites <br /> At former tank site 1 the concentrations of sulfate and nitrate are lower in samples <br />' collected from wells within the hydrocarbon plume (MW-1 and MW-4) than the well <br /> located upgradient of the plume (MW-3) Similarly, the concentrations of dissolved iron, <br /> dissolved manganese, and methane in samples collected from MW-1 and MW-4 are <br />' greater than in the sample collected from MW-3 Furthermore,a comparison of <br /> concentrations observed at MW-1 (located at the downgradient edge of the hydrocarbon <br /> plume) and MW-4 (located in the heart of the plume) generally demonstrates a rebound in <br />' the concentrations of electron acceptors and a decrease in the concentration of metabolic <br /> byproducts at MW-1 versus MW-4 This indicates that biodegradation is occurring at a <br /> higher rate within the heart of the hydrocarbon plume Finally, readings at wells MW-1, <br />' MW-3, and MW-4 indicate that dissolved oxygen concentrations range from 147 to 3 22 <br /> milligrams per liter (mg/1), which is sufficient for biodegradation to occur Figures C-3 <br />' through C-7 present the concentrations of electron acceptors and metabolic byproducts <br /> observed at each sampling location during the April 1999 and February 2000 sampling <br /> events at former tank site 1 <br />' The sample results also indicate that biodegradation is occurring at former tank site 2 <br /> The concentrations of electron acceptors (sulfate and nitrate) are lower in the sample <br />' C-1 <br />