Laserfiche WebLink
Mr Donald Kirk <br /> September 22, 1997 <br /> Page 5 <br /> Presumed fill pipe, and boring USTIS was drilled a <br /> the fill pipe approximately 20 feet west of <br /> The location of UST2 is near the southeast corner of th <br /> within a fenced electrical transformer area Evidencee warehouse building, <br /> reports of a former gas pump used for fueling forklifts of <br /> nthhl U�included <br /> feet square concrete pad with a filled circular pattern <br /> j wall, and a crimped 2-inch diameter s area, a 2 feet by z <br /> p in the middle along the <br /> ground near the pad This i e metal pipe sticking one foot out of the <br /> Again,metal objects in the P cnl y have been the of this feature vent pipe for the tank <br /> determination of the tank's exact location or to orientation prevented geophysical <br /> reported that the electrical transformer and g physical <br /> concrete pad ereein taileinz d employee <br /> approximately five years ago Because it was not ossibl <br /> mounted Geoprebe rig Inside the fenced area, the two soil borings,the truck- <br /> UST25,were drilled just outside the fence (as shown I <br /> were continuously cored from the surface to a orings, UST2N and <br /> n Figure 2) The boreholes <br /> ground water was encountered pproxlmately $ feet bgs, where first <br /> Attachment B Drilling logs for the borings are presented as <br /> ERM Preserved <br /> USTIN and U TIS,land frompls from approximately 7 to 7 5 feet dee I <br />�i UST2N and UST2S, for laboratory approximately 6 5 to 7 feet dee in borP n boreholes <br /> sample was field screened for relative concentrations At the time of collection, each s <br /> photoionization detector PID ntrations of organic vapors usinga <br /> along with a strong hydrocarbon odor,readi gs up to 53$ arts <br /> re detected insoils collected fromion <br /> p7 to <br /> S feet in boxing USTIN PID readings 36 <br /> feet bgs in boring USTIN No significantg ppm were detected In soils from <br /> detected in soils from organic vapors or PID readings were <br /> and degraded hydrocarbon odor were eing USTIS PID ectedreadiI <br /> gs up to 335 ppm (at 6 feet bgs) <br /> vapors u to 503 detected in soils from UST2N Organic <br /> P Ppm (at 8 feet bgs) and degraded hydrocarbon odor <br /> were <br /> detected in soils from boring UST2S <br /> ERM submitted a total of four soil samples from the <br /> locations to the laboratory, where they were presumed former UST <br /> diesel, and for BTEX Hydrocarbon detections n soil for TPH as gasoline and <br /> (Attachment A) Laboratory reports and chain of custody summarized in Table I <br /> and ground water samples are presented as Attachment documentation for sol] <br /> around the presumed former UST locations show u C TPH soli results <br /> diesel and/or motor oil range from I,IOQ to show unknown hydrocarbons in the <br /> hydrocarbons in the gasoline range were detected In <br /> UST2N-7 Ug/kg (ppb) Unknown <br /> and UST2S-7 No VO soil samples USTIN-7, <br /> laboratory reporting limits In any of Using EPA <br /> Alesethod 8260 were detected above <br /> r ethylbenzene and total xylenes y samples, although the VOCs <br /> the samples ng EPA Method 8020 were defected In some of <br />