Laserfiche WebLink
GREGG IN SITU INC. RAMA E ENVIRON <br /> VIRON <br /> March 8, 2002 Stefano Gas <br /> 02-022ma Stockton, Ca <br /> In situ groundwater samples were taken at one location Groundwater samples were <br /> collected using a Hydropunch® type groundwater sampling system (figure 2) The <br /> groundwater sampler operates by pushing 1 75 inch diameter hollow rods with a <br /> retrievable tip A stainless steel filter screen is attached to the tip At the desired <br /> sampling depth, the rods are retracted exposing the filter screen and allowing for <br /> groundwater infiltration A small diameter bailer is then used to collect groundwater <br /> samples through the hollow rod <br /> 3.0 CONE PENETRATION TEST DATA & INTERPRETATION <br /> The cone penetration test data is presented in graphical form Penetration depths are <br /> referenced to existing ground surface This data includes CPT logs of measured soil <br /> parameters and a computer tabulation of interpreted sod types along with additional <br /> geotechnical parameters and pore pressure dissipation data <br /> The stratigraphic interpretation is based on relationships between cone bearing (qc), <br /> sleeve friction (fs), and penetration pore pressure (U) The friction ratio (Rf), which is <br /> sleeve friction divided by cone bearing, is a calculated parameter which is used to infer <br /> soil behavior type Generally, cohesive soils (clays) have high friction ratios, low cone <br /> bearing and generate large excess pore water pressures Cohesionless sods (sands) <br /> have lower friction ratios, high cone bearing and generate little in the way of excess <br /> pore water pressures <br /> The interpretation of soils encountered on this project was carried out using recent <br /> correlations developed by Robertson et al, 1988 It should be noted that it is not always <br /> possible to clearly identify a soil type based on qc, fs and U In these situations, <br /> experience and judgement and an assessment of the pore pressure dissipation data <br /> should be used to infer the soil behavior type The soil classification chart (figure 3) <br /> used to interpret soil types based on qc and Rf is provided in the Appendix <br /> Interpreted output requires that depth of water be entered for calculation purposes, <br /> where depth to water is unknown an arbitrary depth in excess of 10 feet of the deepest <br /> sounding is entered as the groundwater depth <br /> r <br /> r <br /> 1 0 <br />