Laserfiche WebLink
E! F <br /> Mr Michaellnfurna <br /> Page 2 <br /> i <br /> Prior to sampling, monitoring wells MW1 through MW5 were purged a minimum of three well <br /> casing volumes During the purging process, temperature, pH and electrical conductivity <br /> parameters were measured <br /> Samples were collected after parameter stabilization, and appropriate water level recovery Purge <br /> water was contained in properly labeled DOT-approved 55-gallon drums The drums are currently <br /> being stored onsite Purge logs are included in Attachment A <br /> Groundwater samples were delivered under chain of custody protocol to Argon Laboratories (ELAP <br /> #2359) Analysis consisted of TPHg and TPHd using modified EPA method 801513, gasoline <br /> oxygenate additives using EPA method 826013, and BTEX using EPA method 8021 B <br /> Groundwater Analytical Results <br /> EDB and 1,2 DCA were not detected in any site wells BTEX, TPHg, TPHd and gasoline <br /> oxygenates were not detected in wells MWI, MW2, MW4 and MW5 <br /> In well MW3, TPHg was detected at a concentration of 2,200 parts per billion (ppb) Xylenes were <br /> detected at concentrations of 5 1 ppb TPHd was detected at a concentration of 5,100 ppb Methyl- <br /> tert-butyl ether (MTBE) was detected at a concentration of 970 ppb Analytical results are <br /> summarized in Table 2 Attachment B contains laboratory reports and chain of custody <br /> documentation Graphs of TPHg, TPHd and MTBE concentrations over time in MW3 are included <br /> in Attachment C <br /> Summary <br /> • Groundwater levels at the site rose since the previous round of sampling The average <br /> groundwater gradient across the site was 0 003 ft/ft Groundwater flowed predominantly in a <br /> northeasterly direction This is the fifth consecutive quarterly monitoring event in which flow <br /> was toward the northeast <br /> • EDB and 1,2 DCA were not detected above laboratory method detection limits (MDLs) in any <br /> site well Gasoline oxygenates, TPHg, BTEX, and TPHd concentrations were less than <br /> MDLs in wells MWI, MW2, MW4 and MW5 <br /> • Relative to the previous sampling event, the concentration of TPHd in well MW3 decreased <br /> approximately 60% The level of TPHg increased substantially and MTBE increased only <br /> slightly <br /> Conclusions <br /> The contaminant plume is localized in the immediate vicinity of well MW3, and is of very limited <br /> extent Although concentrations spikes can occur from time to time, the cumulative data indicate that <br /> the plume is not migrating, and dissolved contaminant concentrations are stable to decreasing <br /> \\GZA_FSIVOL LIDATAIGROUNDZEIWOOLSEY CHTIQMR12004F1QM2004 doc <br />