My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VICTOR
>
930
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505363
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 9:45:35 AM
Creation date
5/16/2019 2:23:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0505363
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0005584
FACILITY_NAME
VALLEY PACIFIC LODI PLANT & CARDLOCK
STREET_NUMBER
930
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
VICTOR
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
04905023
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
930 E VICTOR RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
AMeuangkhoth
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-" a <br />12 / ORGANIC ANALYTICAL METHODS - GC <br />increased. Detection limits to be used for groundwater samples are indicated <br />in Table 1. Where doubt exists over the identification of a peak on the <br />chromatograph, confirmatory techniques such as mass spectroscopy should be <br />used. <br />8.3 The method detection limit (MDL) is defined as the minimum concen- <br />tration of a substance that can be measured and reported with 99% confidence <br />that the value is above zero. The MDL concentrations listed in Table 1 were <br />obtained using reagent water. Similar results were achieved using represen- <br />tative wastewaters. The MDL actually achieved in a given analysis will vary <br />depending on instrument sensitivity and matrix effects. <br />8.4 In a single laboratory, using reagent water and wastewaters spiked <br />at or near background levels, the average recoveries presented in Table 2 <br />were obtained. The standard deviation of the measurement in percent recovery <br />is also included in Table 2. <br />9.0 References <br />1. Bellar, T.A., and J.J. Lichtenberg. 1974. J. Amer. Water Works <br />Assoc. 66(12):739-744. <br />2. Bellar, T.A., and J.J. Lichtenberg. 1979. Semi -automated headspace <br />analysis of drinking waters and industrial waters for purgeable vola- <br />tile organic compounds. In: Van Hall (ed.), Measurement of organic <br />pollutants in water and wastewater. ASTM STP 686, pp. 108-129. <br />3. Dowty, B.J., S.R. Antoine, and J.L. Laseter. 1979. Quantitative <br />and qualitative analysis of purgeable organics by high resolution gas <br />chromatography and flame ionization detection. In: Van Hall (ed.), <br />Measurement of Organic Pollutants in Water and Wastewater. ASTM STP <br />686, pp. 24-35. <br />4. Development and application of test procedures for specific organic <br />toxic substances in wastewaters. Category 11 - Purgeables and <br />Category 12 - Acrolein, Acrylonitrile, and Dichlorodifluoromethane. <br />Report for EPA Contract 68-03-2635 (in preparation). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.