My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
1805
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0544467
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2019 4:17:17 PM
Creation date
5/16/2019 4:09:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0544467
PE
2959
FACILITY_ID
FA0009741
FACILITY_NAME
EL DORADO CHEMICAL CO INC
STREET_NUMBER
1805
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15514007
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1805 E CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
company Name aelllty EPA ID Number <br /> ELDORADO CHEMICAL CO INC -� b k h k <br /> 6. Did this site identify or implement new SOURCE REDUCTION opportunities to reduce the volume and/or <br /> toxicity of hazardous waste generated at this site? - C3 N A <br /> 1988 1987 Prior Years <br /> Yes No Yes No Yes No <br /> Identify 10 Cl D ❑ KI ❑ <br /> Implement D ❑ 10 ❑ ?U ❑ <br /> 7. What factors have delayed or prevented implementation of SOURCE REDUCTION opportunities? Check all <br /> that apply. ❑ NA <br /> KI a. Insufficient capital to install new source reduction equipment or implement new source reduction <br /> practices. <br /> 1 b. Lack of technical information on source reduction techniques, applicable to my specific production <br /> processes. <br /> ❑ c. Source reduction is not economically feasible: cost savings in waste management or production will <br /> not recover the capital investment. <br /> Y.] d. Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. <br /> Q e. Technical limitations of the production processes. <br /> f] f. Permitting burdens <br /> 87 g. Other (Specify.): RESTSTANCE OF STATE AND FFDFRAT EMPT OYFFS <br /> 8. Did this site identify or implement new RECYCLING opportunities to reduce the volume and/or toxicity of <br /> hazardous waste generated at this site or subsequently treated, stored, or disposed of on site or off site? ❑ NA <br /> 1988 1987 Prior Years <br /> Yes No Yes No Yes No <br /> Identify EK ❑ 11 ❑ ID ❑ <br /> Implement IX ❑ KI ❑ 10 ❑ <br /> 9. What factors have delayed or prevented implementation of on-site or off-site RECYCLING opportunities? <br /> Check all that apply. ❑ N A <br /> ® a. Insufficient capital to install new recycling equipment or implement new recycling practices. <br /> ® b. Lack of technical information on recycling techniques applicable to this site's specific production <br /> processes. <br /> ❑ c. Recycling is not economically feasible: cost savings in waste management or production will not <br /> recover the capital investment. <br /> ® d. Concern that product quality may decline as a result of recycling. <br /> X e. Requirements to manifest wastes inhibit shipments off site for recycling. <br /> ® f. Financial liability provisions inhibit shipments off site for recycling. <br /> ❑ g. Technical limitations of product processes inhibit shipments off site for recycling. <br /> ❑ h. Technical limitations of production processes inhibit on-site recycling. <br /> ® i. Permitting burdens inhibit recycling. <br /> ❑ j. Lack of permitted off-site recycling facilities. <br /> ❑ k. Unable to identify a market for recyclable materials. <br /> ❑ I. Other (Specify.) <br /> QUESTIONS ARE CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE. <br /> DHS 8363 (1/89) Page _of <br /> a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.