Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Ken Price - 2 - 3 July 2003 <br /> treated water is expected to damage tree saplings, so Geomatrix proposes to dilute the treated <br /> water with municipal water to lower the concentrations before irrigating with it. <br /> When diluted, the concentrations of chloride, nitrate, and ammonium will still be above water <br /> quality objectives. However, the underlying groundwater contains nitrate in concentrations <br /> ranging from 350 to 600 mg/l, ammonium ranging from 3 to 265 mg/l, and chloride ranging from <br /> 200 to 464 mg/1. Therefore, we concur with the use of the carbon-treated runoff water as an <br /> irrigant provided the following conditions are met: <br /> • Irrigation will occur at rates that do not exceed estimated consumptive water use of the <br /> irrigated trees (as previously stated our 12 July 2002 Approval of Amended Phytoremediation <br /> Work Plan letter); <br /> • The applied nitrogen loading shall not exceed the seasonal consumptive uptake of nitrate by <br /> the trees; and <br /> • Nitrogen loading data shall be provided in regular phytoremediation reports. <br /> GROUNDWATER CLEANUP CRITERIA <br /> In the 26 February 2003 comment letter, Geomatrix states that several of the entries listed in the <br /> 21 January 2003 Groundwater Cleanup Criteria Table are incongruous with the Water Quality <br /> Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins, 4rh Edition (Basin Plan). <br /> In particular, Geomatrix discusses the following three items and requests that staff revise the <br /> Groundwater Cleanup Criteria Table. <br /> Background Concentrations <br /> We determined the background concentrations identified in our 21 January letter based on the <br /> monitoring record(July 1997 through July 2002) from upgradient MW-16. Based on this record, <br /> we determined if a constituent was routinely present in the upgradient groundwater. The <br /> following table presents the constituent, the range of background concentrations Geomatrix <br /> identified in the record, Board staff s assessment of background, and the supporting reasoning <br /> leading to staff s assessment. <br /> Background Concentration Comment Table <br /> Constituent Range of RWQCB RWQCB Response <br /> Background Background <br /> Chloride 30.3 to 55 mg/L 30 to 55 mg/L We rounded 30.3 to 30 for simplicity. The 1% <br /> difference between the two values is insignificant. <br /> Nitrate-N <2 to 24 mg/L <2 mg/L Nitrate concentrations in MW-16 have been declining <br /> over the five year period of record,and nitrate has not <br /> been detected for the past six consecutive monitoring <br /> events from March 2001 through March 2003. <br /> Therefore,we believe that<2 mg/L is representative <br /> of background concentrations at this site. <br /> Total Kjeldahl <0.5 to 1.3 mg/L <0.5 mg/L TKN was detected at or below 0.5 mg/L for 12 of the <br /> Nitrogen(TKN) 13 monitoring events for which this constituent was <br /> analyzed. It was detected at 1.3 mg/L only once. We <br /> believe that 0.5 mg/L is more representative of <br /> background concentrations than 1.3 mg/L <br />