My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
1904
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544469
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 9:20:58 AM
Creation date
5/17/2019 9:06:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0544469
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0006156
FACILITY_NAME
PURE GRO/BREA*
STREET_NUMBER
1904
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16302041
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1904 W CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
24 March 1993 <br /> (GeoAudit 640-S) <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br /> respectively) . <br /> Benzene, toluene and ethylbenzene were not detected in any of the <br /> soil samples. Xylenes were detected only in sample B3-20 (at a <br /> depth of 20 foot depth) at a level of 0. 22 µg/g (ppm) . TPH as <br /> gasoline was detected in sample B3-20 at a leve pm. No TPH <br /> as gas was detected in any other soil sample. The analytical <br /> results are summarized in Table 3 . The laboratory report and chain <br /> of custody are attached in Appendix A. <br /> Benzene and ethylbenzene were not detected in any of the water <br /> samples. Toluene and xylenes were detected only in the sample from <br /> MW-2, at levels of 0. 38 µg/L and 2 .2 µg/L (ppb) , re egt-iv 1 . TPH <br /> as gasoline was detected in the sample from MW-2 a 530 f�ppb) . <br /> TPH as diesel was detected in the sample from MW-5 at 80 ppb (no <br /> other sample was analyzed for TPH as diesel) . <br /> TPH as gasoline was also detected in samples from MW-4 and MW-5 <br /> (110 ppb and 290 ppb, respectively) . However, according to Alpha <br /> Analytical Laboratories, 50% of the gasoline contamination in MW-4 <br /> and 97% of the gasoline contamination in MW-5 is "an isolated peak <br /> between benzene and toluene" (see laboratory report) . To identify <br /> this peak, the sample from MW-5 was analyzed for halogenated / <br /> volatile organics. Of the 31 HVO analytes, only 1, 2-Dichloropropane ✓_ <br /> was detected (330 ppb) . The water sample analysis are summarized in <br /> Table 4 . The laboratory report and chain of custody are attached in <br /> Appendix B. <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> The analytical results of the soil samples indicate that the soil <br /> contamination associated with the former underground storage tank <br /> is limited in lateral extent above groundwater levels. Only one <br /> soil sample contained any hydrocarbon contamination (B3-20; MW-2) <br /> and this sample is well within the saturated groundwater zone (20 <br /> feet in depth) . The limited contamination in this boring indicates <br /> that hydrocarbons in the vadose zone are present primarily beneath <br /> the former location of the UST's. Because of the limited lateral <br /> extent, the soil contamination can probably be remediated by <br /> excavation and either on-site treatment or off-site disposal. <br /> TPH as gasoline in the water samples (except MW-5) are contoured in <br /> Figure 4 . The TPH value of the sample from MW-4 was adjusted to <br /> represent only the gasoline fraction in the contour map. The <br /> dissolved hydrocarbon plume apparently extends off-site from <br /> pastern side of the property. Additional investigation on the <br /> neighboring property to the east will be probably be required in <br /> y order to fully define the contaminant plume. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.