My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHEROKEE
>
16
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0522479
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 2:14:40 PM
Creation date
5/17/2019 2:01:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0522479
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0015299
FACILITY_NAME
GEWEKE LAND DEVELOPMENT & MARKETING
STREET_NUMBER
16
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
CHEROKEE
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
04323013
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
16 S CHEROKEE LN
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
568
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Bioremediation - 6 - to September 1993 <br /> It is difficult to prove that in-situ bioremediation is occurring. It is necessary to show that the mass <br /> of gasoline has decreased and at the same time show that microorganisms are the causative agent. <br /> Difficulties arise because gasoline infiltrates the porous soil matrix, partially dissolves, disperses, is <br /> diluted, is sorbed onto soil and other particles, and volatilizes, thus mass balance estimates may be <br /> unattainable. in addition, there are no morphologically distinctive gasoline-degrading <br /> microorganisms, <br /> There is no accurate way to measure petroleum biodegradation directly. However, there are several <br /> methods to attempt to measure biodegradation indirectly. Mineralization or total degradation can be <br /> monitored by COz emissions. However, this does not measure the conversion of hydrocarbons to <br /> metabolites or cell mass. Lass of Total Organic Carbon measures mineralization but nothing more. <br /> Oxygen uptake does take in both mineralization as well as partial oxidation, but one does not know <br /> how far the oxidation has gone or what has been converted to biomass. It may also be possible to <br /> detect the presence of carbon dioxide produced from aerobic biodegradation of hydrocarbons using <br /> carbon isotope detection - VC versus CO-z. However, anaerobic degradation may also result in a <br /> range of VC values for the degradation of CQ=. Contaminant concentrations should also be <br /> monitored for decreases which may or may not indicate bioremediation. Increased numbers of <br /> microorganisms that utilize the contaminant may indicate that hioremediatton is occurring. <br /> Monitoring of other parameters may be useful as well in detecting changes in reactants, such as <br /> dissolved oxygen (DO), oxygen gas, and nutrients, and reaction products such as intermediate <br /> metabolites and COI. Methane, NOx, Oz, NO3, and NO,-/Br may be monitored to detect in-situ <br /> denitrification. In addition, DO, pH, temperature, and nitrate/nitrite concentrations may indicate <br /> that reactions are occurring, although they do not determine the type of reactions. <br /> In order to monitor in-situ bioremediation, it is necessary to collect periodic water level <br /> measurements and ground water and soil samples. This means maintaining monitoring wells and <br /> periodic soil borings. <br /> Before in-situ bioremediation is attempted, it is necessary to screen the site to determine if it will <br /> work. This procedure may he summarized as follows: <br /> SITESCREENING <br /> 1. Site Study <br /> a. Biodegradability of contaminants (gasoline is biodegradable) <br /> b. Time requirements (biodegradation takes up to two years) <br /> C. Space considerations (on-site versus in-situ) <br /> d. Volume of material to he treated (typical minimum volume of soil - 250 to 500 cu yds) <br /> C, Costs of alternative options ($25 - $75Jcu yd for bioremediation of hydrocarbons with <br /> boiling points C 650° F) <br /> 2. Regulatory Analysis <br /> a, Limiting Regulations (Basin Plans, Discharge Permits, Policies, etc.) <br /> b. Statutory Treatment Criteria (MCLS, SNARLS, Policies, etc.) <br /> II ' d 800- ON ££:6 £6` 9I dab ON Ill <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.