Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM 0 <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD • CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> 3443 Routier Road, Suite A Phone: (916) 255-3000 <br /> Sacramento, CA 95827-3098 CALNET: 8-494-3000 <br /> TO: GORDON L. BOGGS FROM: ELIZABETH A. THAYER <br /> UGT Program Coordinator Associate Engineer <br /> DATE: 20 September 1993 SIGNATURE:I <br /> Csf (? . <br /> SUBJECT: FINAL REMEDIAL PLAN (FRP), GEWEKE, 16 SOUTH CHEROKEE LANE, <br /> LODI, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> I have reviewed the Final Remedial Plan (FRP), dated 30 July 1993, prepared by Geweke's <br /> consultants, Geological Audit Services (GeoAudit). <br /> SUMMARY OF THE FRP <br /> For soil remediation options, the FRP includes excavation, vapor extraction, and in-situ <br /> bioremediation. Costs were submitted for vapor extraction but not for excavation or in-situ bio. <br /> Excavation was considered not viable. For ground water remediation options, the FRP includes <br /> pump and treat and in-situ bio. Costs were provided for pump and treat only. It was implied that <br /> costs for in-situ bio of both soil and ground water are minimal. No other options were discussed for <br /> either soil or ground water. Based on their discussions of remedial options, GeoAudit recommended <br /> in-situ bio for both soil and ground water. <br /> In the FRP, case study information was provided for two sites, one in Ukiah and one in Apple <br /> Valley. They provided graphics for the Apple Valley site, and graphics and a table of ground water <br /> data for the Ukiah site. The Ukiah site was an ex-situ soil case in which the soil was treated above <br /> ground and then placed back in the pit. They have recorded a drop in ground water contamination <br /> since the soil was removed from the pit. <br /> The bacteria that GeoAudit will use for in-situ bio are indigenous to soil (although not indigenous to <br /> the site), non-pathogenic, and have been isolated from sites severely contaminated with <br /> hydrocarbons. The bacteria will be inoculated into wells that are screened through the contaminant <br /> plume. After inoculation, a low-pressure air source will be manifolded to the wells to provide <br /> additional oxygen and accelerate bioremediation. GeoAudit asserts that essential nutrients are <br /> generally available in the soil, however, if supplements are needed, the amounts will probably be <br /> very low. The only equipment required for this procedure, is a blower unit to introduce air to the <br /> subsurface. <br /> To bioremediate the soil, they propose to introduce the bacteria to the subsurface through vadose <br /> zone wells, VW1 through VW4, and the dry monitoring wells, MW1, MW3, MW4, and MW5. <br /> Three additional vadose zone wells may be installed at specified locations. To monitor the <br /> effectiveness of the soil bioremediation, GeoAudit proposes to drill one or two borings on a biannual <br />