Laserfiche WebLink
19 June 1992 <br /> (GeoAudit CV 30-34E3-1. 33) <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> C) The treatment system is capable to adsorb hydrocarbon <br /> contaminants effectively to the General Waste Discharge <br /> Requirements. No modification is planned. <br /> d) According to the data available to our company, MW-2 did <br /> not indicate the presence of contamination. Being up- <br /> gradient from the former tank/dispenser areas, this well <br /> is suitable for re-injection of the treated water. The <br /> rate of re-injection depends on the actual rate of <br /> recovery. Approximately between 4, 000 to 6, 000 gallons/ <br /> week of treated water is estimated to be re-injected back <br /> to the aquifer. The re-injection is conducted upon the <br /> holding tank reaching the maximum capacity. <br /> 4 . Upon authorization to proceed with the FRP from your agency <br /> and from Geweke, an application for the Waste Discharge Permit <br /> will be submitted to the Central Valley - Regional Water <br /> Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) . <br /> 5. We believe that all aspects on the memorandum have been <br /> addressed accordingly. <br /> If you have any questions, please feel free to call our office. <br /> Sincerely, pr- <br /> GEOLOGICAL AUDIT SERVICES, INC. <br /> FJ �nN <br /> f10. <br /> Josue© <br /> Bob Marty Joshua Ong, Ph.D. <br /> Staff Geologist V Senior Project Hydrogeologist <br /> Registered Geologist No. 4725 <br /> Enclosures <br /> cc: (1) Mr. Jeff Werner - Geweke <br />