Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM i <br /> ' �QAL'IFORNIA REGIONAL WA`fER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD•CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> 3443 Routier Road, Suite A Phone: (916) 361-5600 <br /> Sacramento, CA 95827-3098 ATSS Phone: 8-495-5600 <br /> TO: GORDON L. BOGGS FROM: ELIZABETH A. THAYER <br /> UGT Program Coordinator Associate Engineer / <br /> DATE: 30 March 1992 SIGNATURE: �4 <br /> SUBJECT: REVIEW OF FINAL REMEDIAL ACTION WORK PLAN, 16 SOUTH CHEROKEE LANE, LODI, <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> I have reviewed the "Final Remedial Action Work Plan" (FRP) , dated 2 January <br /> 1992, prepared by Geological Audit Services, Inc. (GAS) for Geweke. The <br /> proposed remedial actions consist of soil vapor extraction, incineration of <br /> the extracted vapors, ground water extraction and carbon filtration, and <br /> reinjection of the treated ground water. However, the FRP was incomplete. <br /> The attached figure shows existing monitoring wells and the extraction well . <br /> My comments follow: <br /> 1 . Figures showing the extent of soil and ground water contamination were <br /> not provided. <br /> 2. On page 5 of the FRP, in a discussion of the soil vapor extraction <br /> system, GAS stated that when the vapor recovery system achieves 500 ppm <br /> as hexane, confirmatory soil samples will be collected. This value is <br /> not a soil cleanup limit used by the Central Valley Regional Board. <br /> When non-detectable levels of contamination have been achieved by a <br /> vapor extraction system, the vapor extraction system is to be pulsed or <br /> surged to determine if soil contamination remains. If contamination is <br /> not detected, then confirmatory soil borings are then drilled and soil <br /> samples collected for laboratory analysis. The extraction system must <br /> also be pulsed or surged if the extracted vapor concentrations have <br /> reached a plateau. Additional soil remediation techniques may be <br /> necessary if soil contamination levels cannot be reduced by pulsing. <br /> 3. The vapor extraction wells proposed in the FRP will be screened from 4 <br /> feet to 70 feet. In the vicinity of MW-4, where soil contamination is <br /> extensive, long screen lengths may be appropriate due to the sandy soil <br /> at the site. Long screen lengths provide a larger volume of soil to <br /> which a vacuum must be applied which means a more powerful vacuum must <br /> be applied to the extraction well . In addition, long screen lengths may <br /> extend through varying lithologies creating a short circuit effect where <br /> vapors move more easily through the more porous soils, such as sands and <br /> gravels, and bypass finer soils, such as clays and silts. In the soil <br /> above the ground water zone, hydrocarbons will be more concentrated in <br /> clays and silts than in sands and gravels, therefore, when the clays and <br /> silts are bypassed, contaminants may be left behind. <br /> 4. The proposed soil vapor extraction system is limited to the vicinity of <br /> MW-4. However, wells MW-1, -3, and -5, previously contained <br /> significant ground water contamination but are now dry. The proposed <br />