My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHEROKEE
>
16
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0522479
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 2:14:40 PM
Creation date
5/17/2019 2:01:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0522479
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0015299
FACILITY_NAME
GEWEKE LAND DEVELOPMENT & MARKETING
STREET_NUMBER
16
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
CHEROKEE
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
04323013
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
16 S CHEROKEE LN
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
568
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM i <br /> ' �QAL'IFORNIA REGIONAL WA`fER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD•CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> 3443 Routier Road, Suite A Phone: (916) 361-5600 <br /> Sacramento, CA 95827-3098 ATSS Phone: 8-495-5600 <br /> TO: GORDON L. BOGGS FROM: ELIZABETH A. THAYER <br /> UGT Program Coordinator Associate Engineer / <br /> DATE: 30 March 1992 SIGNATURE: �4 <br /> SUBJECT: REVIEW OF FINAL REMEDIAL ACTION WORK PLAN, 16 SOUTH CHEROKEE LANE, LODI, <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> I have reviewed the "Final Remedial Action Work Plan" (FRP) , dated 2 January <br /> 1992, prepared by Geological Audit Services, Inc. (GAS) for Geweke. The <br /> proposed remedial actions consist of soil vapor extraction, incineration of <br /> the extracted vapors, ground water extraction and carbon filtration, and <br /> reinjection of the treated ground water. However, the FRP was incomplete. <br /> The attached figure shows existing monitoring wells and the extraction well . <br /> My comments follow: <br /> 1 . Figures showing the extent of soil and ground water contamination were <br /> not provided. <br /> 2. On page 5 of the FRP, in a discussion of the soil vapor extraction <br /> system, GAS stated that when the vapor recovery system achieves 500 ppm <br /> as hexane, confirmatory soil samples will be collected. This value is <br /> not a soil cleanup limit used by the Central Valley Regional Board. <br /> When non-detectable levels of contamination have been achieved by a <br /> vapor extraction system, the vapor extraction system is to be pulsed or <br /> surged to determine if soil contamination remains. If contamination is <br /> not detected, then confirmatory soil borings are then drilled and soil <br /> samples collected for laboratory analysis. The extraction system must <br /> also be pulsed or surged if the extracted vapor concentrations have <br /> reached a plateau. Additional soil remediation techniques may be <br /> necessary if soil contamination levels cannot be reduced by pulsing. <br /> 3. The vapor extraction wells proposed in the FRP will be screened from 4 <br /> feet to 70 feet. In the vicinity of MW-4, where soil contamination is <br /> extensive, long screen lengths may be appropriate due to the sandy soil <br /> at the site. Long screen lengths provide a larger volume of soil to <br /> which a vacuum must be applied which means a more powerful vacuum must <br /> be applied to the extraction well . In addition, long screen lengths may <br /> extend through varying lithologies creating a short circuit effect where <br /> vapors move more easily through the more porous soils, such as sands and <br /> gravels, and bypass finer soils, such as clays and silts. In the soil <br /> above the ground water zone, hydrocarbons will be more concentrated in <br /> clays and silts than in sands and gravels, therefore, when the clays and <br /> silts are bypassed, contaminants may be left behind. <br /> 4. The proposed soil vapor extraction system is limited to the vicinity of <br /> MW-4. However, wells MW-1, -3, and -5, previously contained <br /> significant ground water contamination but are now dry. The proposed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.