|
�.w�u' `—'t C�� "ti �a � r �. ycW.. Gni.. "«`s.`�',,F` ��"�r.��na �_„'�..M 4n,,7 �,��� '�� aS`”'_'"`3^�,x�iY �•��w� Jri�,. �,r +' __-:t � _
<br /> N.
<br /> x,
<br /> �u'�."S-2uF.�u.�++•'i f � r�'%"'�f �r}a _w+,I k'�t" Ami l"n .•cv. � .�
<br /> ' r ��4 T+�.��,,,4* a'p .:3"�,•,A ^'t4 �kr rl m ,�,� s ... �ti, '�' 4':�*%�-���e �+„- a1,•�' n=<
<br /> ,�.n g J.t,t t:kn' S'f•f � wn.. k �w°5.'i
<br /> k
<br /> f�4 nen q.ufa4
<br /> rORNfA REGIONAL WATER Ll',y C
<br /> ITRAL VALLEY REGIONONIFROL 80AND--
<br /> { -JJ NCU71EF1 ROAD
<br /> .ACf ARif(_NTO,CA 55a2a303G
<br /> �x
<br /> 4 l pr i t 1990 .: C ,.
<br /> Nr, Keith fioward
<br /> Cooper, White S ?i'P r, i'nIT F.COIF'
<br /> r . 1333 r], Caaper
<br /> California Coulevar`d, Suite 450
<br /> Walnut Creek, CA 94596
<br /> GEWEKE LAN() DEVELOPMEM Atli) MARKETING PROPERTY [GEWEKI 16 SOUTH CHEROKEE LANE
<br /> CLJ=ANUP AND ABATEMENT ORDER No. 90-702 �:
<br /> , tOpI -
<br /> Ile have received your IO March 1990 letter responding llU 90-702. Inclosed with the 1 9 to Cl anu
<br /> additional ground water monitnrinetter was an amended work p and Abaten;ent Older
<br /> quality resulting front discharges g wells to identif pian far installing `Onr
<br /> work Ses of petroleum hydro ar•l;onseatethis sint of te. The
<br /> t° tinter
<br /> pian appears adequate to comply with the first re uireme
<br /> Therefore, the amended work plan is accepted. the amended
<br /> 4 nt Of Order tlo. 9G-702.
<br /> •• In your letter you expressed
<br /> that your client would have been cwiII , disappointment with the Order, a,rd indicated
<br /> IvithOut Formal enforcement action,
<br /> and Abatement Orders ",)et-e it deems such lase be
<br /> necessary to complete the investigation voluntarily
<br /> Please be aware that this Board issues Cleanup
<br /> These enforcement actions are not restricted to sites with uncooperative art'
<br /> i., those unwilling LO conduct voluntary in,( to
<br /> and cleanupofdischartes atality.
<br /> sites. The intent of this order P les or
<br /> Cieanup and Abatement Order Na 7s not to punish your clie2 was ; nt as 4 their
<br /> schedule r"or remediation which we elie�e was sy you have suggested.
<br /> ued to establish a reasonable time
<br /> quality and to prevent the further raigratiOn ofstified contaminadnts,
<br /> necessary to protect water
<br /> You have stated that Other sources may have
<br /> if there were evidence to support the claim
<br /> thatnanrOffed t6
<br /> contamination the contamination. Even
<br /> extent dour client is still responsible for the investigation to define the
<br /> source contributed to the
<br /> and cleanup Of the contamination resulting from discharges at their site,
<br /> ate have addressed the
<br /> Objectionable" as followprovisions of the order which you acrd your client
<br /> 'find
<br /> I. Because the Order reg that the extent OF impacts to
<br /> .Your client will lravesre,
<br /> cantro] and t0 install off-site wells ground water be defined, vP
<br /> therefore, cannot obtain access, on Property which they da not ti..
<br /> Investigation Of discharges from leaking underground stara e tanks
<br /> requires investigation off-site , r
<br /> through negotiating Cooperative accesscayreements. Regional Q and s ual frequently
<br /> to adjacent sites is usually arranged
<br /> Parties in gaining access for ofF-site investigations should the site owner's
<br /> independent efforts fail, toff may assist
<br /> effort to gain access However, Geweke must first demonstrate a reasonable r
<br />
|