Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> 8 March 1993 <br /> (GeaAudit MDC Ukiah-1. 2) <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> PROCEDURES <br /> On 3 February 1993 , the water level in each well was measured <br /> relative to the top of the casing. The relative piezometric levels <br /> and hydraulic gradient were determined from these data (Table 1 and <br /> Figure 3) . After water levels were measured, a purge pump was used <br /> to surge and purge each well, and approximately 8 gallons of water <br /> were removed from all wells to stabilize temperature, pH and <br /> conductivity (see Table 2) . The water was stored in 55-gallon drums <br /> on-site. <br /> Water samples were collected using a disposable plastic bailer. The <br /> samples were collected in 40 ml EPA vials and transported in a <br /> chilled container to Alpha Analytical Laboratories in Ukiah. The <br /> samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH as <br /> gasoline) and volatile aromatics (BTE&X) in accordance with EPA <br /> methods 8015/LUFT and 602 , respectively. <br /> FINDINGS <br /> The groundwater gradient direction ranges from northeast to east. <br /> The groundwater elevation data and gradient direction are shown <br /> graphically in Figure 3 (Lines of Equal Groundwater Elevation) . <br /> TPH as gasoline was detected in the sample from MW-1 at 2 , 600 gg/L <br /> (ppb) . Benzene, ethylbenzene and xylenes were detected in the <br /> sample from MW-1 at levels of 3 ppb, 103 ppb and 170 ppb, <br /> respectively. Toluene was detected in samples from MW-2 and MW-3 at <br /> levels of 0.93 ppb and 0.4 ppb, respectively. No TPH or BTE&X were <br /> detected in any other samples. The water sample analysis is <br /> summarized in Table 3 . The laboratory report and chain of custody <br /> are attached in Appendix A. <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> Based upon field observations and the analytical results of water <br /> samples, groundwater beneath the northeast corner of the site (MW- <br /> 1) remains contaminated with moderate levels of petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons. However, a comparison of the groundwater sample <br /> analytical results from this sampling and from September 1992 <br /> (Table 4) indicates a significant decrease in hydrocarbon <br /> concentrations in MW-1. The decrease in concentrations suggests <br /> that removal of the source, biodegradation or other factors have <br />• reduced the concentrations of hydrocarbons -in groundwater. <br /> GeoAudit recommends that the wells be monitored on a quarterly <br /> basis for a period of one year. An evaluation of the data can then <br /> be completed and, if the current trend is continued, a closure may <br /> be requested at that time. <br />