Laserfiche WebLink
:Addressing Land Disposal Restrictions in particular waste is more difficult to treat than the <br /> ' eiotreatrnent <br /> waste on which the standard was based.There are <br /> (Continued from page 2) two kinds of treatability variances: (1) variances <br /> with generic applicability, which apply to a spe- <br /> meaning the waste must be treated until a certain cific waste at any site, and (2) site-specific vari- <br /> concentration of hazardous constituents is attained. antes, which apply only to a particular waste at a <br /> Other wastes have technology-bated standards for specific site. For more information on site-spe- <br /> situations in which there is no analytical method. cific variances, refer to Regional Guide:Issuing Site- <br /> I*hrrr nw, i I w w;i5tr,imi o I)i, tri•.it rt;Iin 1114,t h- Slrr'rrfic 7i-olialulittl I'llriorrr'r'sfeu ['rrrrfu�ttitrrtr4.11 aril: <br /> ods, deemed Best Demonstrated Available and Debris from Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) <br /> Technologies (BDATs). If biotreatment cannot per- (Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response <br /> form adequately for a waste with a concentration- <br /> based standard, a variance must be obtained or an [OSWER] Directive 9380.3-0$FS), which can be <br /> ordered by calling the RCRA/Superfund Hotline <br /> alternative technology substituted. at 800-424-9346 or 703-920-9810 in the Washing- <br /> Contaminated Debris ton, DC area. <br /> The LDR Contaminated Debris Rule defines hazard- No-migration petitions are granted if an appli- <br /> ous debris as any solid material intended for discard cant can demonstrate that hazardous waste <br /> that is contarninated with hazardous waste or that <br /> exhibits one or more of the hazardous waste charac- will not migrate from the place of disposal for <br /> teristics. To be classified as debris, the solid material as long as the waste remains hazardous. These <br /> must have a particle size in excess of 60 mrn (2.5 in.) petitions may be especially useful for biotreat- <br /> and be a manufactured ob)ect, plant or animal mat- ers considering land treatment, in which soil is <br /> ter, or natural geologic material. treated and left in place. For more information <br /> In the past, contaminated debris was subject to the on no-migration petitions for RCRA sites, see <br /> concentration-based treatment standard for the par- Variances to the Hazardous Waste Land Disposal <br /> titular waste with which the debris was contami- Prohibitions: .4 Guidance for Petitioners. For more <br /> nated. Adhering to this standard is still acceptable, information on no-migration petitions for Super- <br /> but the new rule adds the option to treat hazardous fund sites, refer to OSWER Directive 9347.3-1 OFS, <br /> debris With one or more BDATs specified for each which also can be ordered by calling the <br /> debris/contaminant combination. These tethnolo- RCRA/Superfund Hotline. <br /> gies are divided into extraction, immobilization,and <br /> destruction technologies. Biodegradation is identi- o The concept of the correctize action nrnnagerrrent <br /> fieri as a destruction technology for several types of unit (CAMU) was established by the proposed <br /> hazardous debris, including debris contaminated Subpart S under RCRA for corrective action. This <br /> with most common organic compounds, concept allows RCRA sites to treat wastes and <br /> Contaminated Soil contaminated soils within the CAMU without <br /> Phase 2 of the rule, LDRs for Newlv Listed. Waste triggering the LDRs. The CAMU portion of Sub- <br /> and Contaminated Soil, is scheduled for proposal in part S is scheduled for promulgation in Decem- <br /> Fall of 1992 and promulgation in Spring of 1993. ber 1992. For more information on CAMU <br /> These kvill be published in the Federal Register. Bio re- exemptions, refer to the Federal Register (55 FR <br /> mediation is a possible BDAT standard for contami- 30789). <br /> nated soil,so EPA encourages biotreaters in the field <br /> to evaluate the proposed rule and comment accord- • An LDR BDAT exemption for ground-wafer reinjec- <br /> ingly. Until new treatment standards for contami- tion is available. This exemption will be useful for <br /> nated soils are promulgated, however, biotreaters RCRA and CERCLA bioremediation sites where <br /> must comply with current LDRs, obtain a treatabil- ground water is pumped to the surface to be <br /> itv variance, or apply for a no-migration petition amended, then reinjected. For more information <br /> from LDR standards. on reinjection exemptions, refer to OSWER Direc- <br /> Compliance Alternatives tive 9234.1-06. <br /> Alternatives to compliance with the LDRs are avail- For more information, contact Michael Forlini of <br /> able to biotreaters: <br /> OSWER's Technology Innovation Office at 703-308- <br /> Treatability variances to concentration-based treat- 8825, or call the RCRA/Superfund Hotline at 800-424- <br /> ment standards are available in the event that a 9346 or 703-920-9810 in the Washington, DC area. <br /> 8 <br />