My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001629
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHEROKEE
>
16
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0522479
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001629
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 3:43:00 PM
Creation date
5/17/2019 2:13:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0001629
RECORD_ID
PR0522479
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0015299
FACILITY_NAME
GEWEKE LAND DEVELOPMENT & MARKETING
STREET_NUMBER
16
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
CHEROKEE
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
04323013
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
16 S CHEROKEE LN
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> the continuing source of the contamination, it was addressed first. <br /> Approximately 3 , 000 cubic yards of contaminated soil were excavated <br /> and treated ex-situ (above ground) . After levels of contamination <br /> I in the soil reached non-detect (ND) , it was used to backfill the <br /> original excavation. <br /> After the treated soil was backfilled, groundwater samples <br /> collected during the regular quarterly monitoring showed dramatic <br /> decreases in concentrations of all hydrocarbons over a 10-month <br />' period (see Appendix E) . Levels of hydrocarbons decreased from <br /> 7 , 500 parts per billion (ppb) to 1, 500 ppb during that period. No <br /> other groundwater treatment was used at this site. <br /> I In-situ bioremediation of groundwater at the Geweke site can <br /> probably be achieved more quickly and at lower cost than required <br /> for a pump and treat method. Moreover, the potential for achieving <br /> non-detect results is greater than in most pump and treat <br /> operations. <br /> 6.0 RECOMMENDED REMEDIATION METHODS <br /> 6. 1 In-Situ Bioremediation <br /> GeoAudit concludes that bioremediation will be the most technically <br /> feasible and cost effective method to mitigate soil and groundwater <br /> contamination at the Geweke site. All work performed by GeoAudit <br /> will be done under the supervision of a Microbiologist and a <br /> Registered Geologist. <br />' 6. 1. 1 General Considerations <br /> The following general considerations of the properties of <br /> I bioremediation provide the basis for the course of action <br /> recommended in the following sections. <br /> I ■ The same biological cultures can be used to treat the soil as <br /> to treat the groundwater. <br /> ■ The bacteria are non-pathogenic and indigenous to soil. They <br /> have been cultured to consume hydrocarbons, and without an <br /> available hydrocarbon food source, die back to population <br /> levels reflective of indigenous soil populations. <br /> ■ Unlike other methods, bioremediation has the potential to <br /> remediate soil and groundwater to non-detectable levels. <br /> I ■ Bioremediation of the soil and groundwater is accomplished <br /> without extensive above ground-equipment and without labor <br /> intensive maintenance or monitoring. <br /> 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.