Laserfiche WebLink
I I August 1999 <br /> • -AGE-NC Project No: 95-0109 <br /> Page 4 of 10 <br /> To prepare this estimate of hydrocarbon mass in soil prior to remediation and at,the present time, <br /> AGE made the-following assumptions; , <br /> Areas between adjacent sampling points'-with detectable hydro' ons!-are.impacted'at a.,# <br /> I . concentrations intermediate to those-detected"ire the sampled points: <br /> Average concentrations were visually,weighted,based'the liinited number of sampling points• <br />' and plotted on cross sections and subsurface maps.:' <br /> Mass calculations, conversion factors and assumptions are included in Appendix E. <br /> 2.8. MONITORING_WELL PURGE PROCEDURES <br /> On 17 March and 24 June 1999,'a Soli_nst water level meter was used to measure`the depth to ground• <br /> water in the monitoring wells relative to the.tops of the well casings (Table 3). For the March 1.999 ' <br />' monitoring event, each monitoring well and EW-1 were then.purged using a Grundfos pump or PVC <br /> bailer. Far the June 1999 monitoring event,.wells MW-6, MW-7, MW-8, MW-9, MW-11, MW-12' <br /> and MW-14,were purged using a Grundfos pump. Approximately three well-volumes ofwater,were <br /> removed from each well'during.purging. <br /> Temperature, pH -and conductivity. of the purge water were measured at regular purge-volume , <br /> intervals using,an ICM or-Hydac water analyzer and were recorded on field logs. The percent , <br /> dissolved'oxygen was measured in the final purged water of each well. Field data and work sheets <br />' <br /> .,are included in.Appendix-C-The purged water was placed in DOT-approved drums and stored on- , <br /> site. <br /> Due to the unusual,ground water gradient determined for the June 1999 monitoring event, the depth <br /> •to ground-water was remeasured..in wells MW-6.through MW=14 and EW-,1 on 30 July 1999(Table, <br /> 3). Y <br /> 2.9. COLLECTION'OF:GROUND WATER SAMPLES „ <br /> For both sampling events, the depth to water in each purged.well; except MW-2, was remeasured <br />' after-purging to ensure a minimum of 80-per.cent recharge prior'to sampling.. Water samples were <br /> _collected from'each purged well,using-disposable plastic bailers. Immediately upon retrieval, the <br /> samples were transferred int6.40=ml'EPA-approved VOA-vials'containing,0.5 Int 18% hydrochloric ' <br /> facid as a sample preservative.,.The samples were labeled, stored on-ice, and transported in a chilled <br /> container, under chain-of-custody,to MAI. All 'samples.were analyzed for: . <br /> Advanced GeoEnviron menial,Inc. <br />