Laserfiche WebLink
t <br /> Jeffrey Baker <br /> Tesoro Petroleum Site No. 67078 <br /> April 23, 2004 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> Two soil samples from each boring were submitted to Kiff Analytical LLC (Kiff Analytical) of Davis, <br /> California, for analysis of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX), methyl tertiary butyl <br /> ether, tertiary butyl alcohol, tertiary amyl methyl ether, di-isopropyl ether, and ethyl tertiary butyl ether <br /> (oxygenates), 1,2-dichloroethane and 1,2-dibromoethane (lead scavengers), and total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons in the gasoline range (TPHg) using EPA Method 8260B. The Kiff laboratory report is <br /> presented in Enclosure C. <br /> Results <br /> Soil borings were advanced near the fuel tanks and dispenser islands at the locations shown on Figure 2. <br /> Screening of soil samples with a PID did not detect the presence of volatile organic compounds. The PID <br /> results are presented on the soil boring logs included in Enclosure B. All but one of the PID results were <br /> zero. The one sample measured 4 part per million volume(ppmv). This readings is considered background. <br /> No odor or petroleum staining was observed in soil samples. The soil borings were not advanced to <br /> groundwater because field screening of soil samples did not detect petroleum hydrocarbon contamination. <br /> One soil sample collected at 5, 10, or 15 feet from each boring was submitted to Kiff Analytical for <br /> chemical analyses. Also, the bottom sample from each boring collected at 30 feet was submitted to Kiff <br /> Analytical for chemical analyses. With the exception of one analysis,Kiff Analytical did not detect BTEX, <br /> oxygenates, lead scavengers, or TPHg at or above the reporting limits. The laboratory analysis of the soil <br /> sample from boring B-4,collected at 30 feet bsg identified TPHg at 2.3 milligrams per kilogram. This is not <br /> considered to be a significant concentration. Furthermore, Kiff Analytical reported that the concentration <br /> was not typical of gasoline based on the observed chromatographic pattern. The laboratory chemical <br /> analyses results are summarized in Table 1 and the laboratory report presented in Enclosure C. <br /> Disposal of Drill Cuttings <br /> Two drums of soil cuttings generated during drilling activities were placed onsite. On April 9, 2004, <br /> Integrated Waste Management Inc.,of Milpitas,California removed the drummed soil from the site. <br /> Recommendations <br /> Delta did not encounter evidence of a fuel leak during the baseline assessment work performed at the site. <br /> Delta concludes that no further actions are needed at this site. <br /> Remarks/Signatures <br /> The recommendations contained in this report represent Delta's professional opinions based upon the <br /> currently available information and are arrived at in accordance with currently acceptable professional <br /> standards. This report is based upon a specific scope of work requested by the client. The Contract between <br /> Delta and its client outlines the scope of work,and only those tasks specifically authorized by the contract or <br /> outlined in this report were performed. This report is intended only for the use of Delta's Client and anyone <br /> else specifically listed on this report. Delta will not and cannot be liable for unauthorized reliance by any <br /> third party. Other than as contained in this paragraph,Delta makes no express or implies warranty as to the <br /> contents of this report. <br />