Laserfiche WebLink
• Quarterly Ground-Water Monitoring March 8, 1989 <br /> Beacon Station No. 1-502, Lodi, California AGS 86091-6 <br /> Hazardous Waste Testing Laboratory Certificate No. 153) , and <br /> analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline by <br /> modified Environmental Protection Avency (EPA) Method 8015 and <br /> the purgable hydrocarbon constituents benzene, toluene, <br /> Cā€ž% ethylbenzene, and total xylene isomers (BTEX) by EPA Method 8020. <br /> The results of these and previous laboratory analyses are <br /> presented in Table 2 and copies of the laboratory analysis <br /> reports are attached to this letter report. <br /> The results of the laboratory analyses indicate that the <br /> concentrations of benzene, toluene and ethylbenzene in the <br /> samples collected from monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-2 have <br /> increased since the September 1988 sampling event. The benzene <br /> and ethylbenzene concentrations also increased in the sample from <br /> well MW-4. An increase in most of these constituents was also <br /> evident in the September 1988 sampling event (reported in AGS <br /> Report No. 86091-6, dated December 1, 1988) . The benzene <br /> concentration in the samples collected from wells MW-1, MW-2 and <br /> MW,-4 exceeded the action level recommended for drinking water by <br /> the California Department of Health Services. The concentration <br /> of total xylene isomers and TPH as gasoline decreased in the <br /> samples from wells MW-1 and MW-2 ; however, the concentration of <br /> TPH increased in samples from wells MW-3 and MW-4 . BTEX <br /> concentrations in samples collected from monitoring wells MW-3 <br /> and MW-5 remained below the detection limits of the analytical <br /> ~J` methods used. <br /> The ground-water gradient across the site was evaluated by <br /> combining measurements of the static water level with the <br /> relative elevation of the top of the casing in each monitoring <br /> well. The relative elevation of the top of the casing in each <br /> well was previously evaluated with a Lietz/Sokkisha C3E Automatic <br /> Level. The static water levels were adjusted using the top of <br /> the casing in well MW-3 as a common datum. These data are <br /> summarized in Table 3 , and were used to evaluate the gradient of <br /> the static ground-water surface at the time of this quarterly <br /> monitoring event (Plate P-3) . The evaluated ground-water <br /> gradient was 0.003, and the flow direction was toward the <br /> southwest. The orientation of the ground-water gradient is <br /> similar to that in previous sampling events; the most recent <br /> data, however, show a variation in the magnitude of the gradient <br /> across the site. <br /> Because hydrocarbon contaminant concentrations in ground-water <br /> samples collected from wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-4 have increased <br /> during the last two monitoring events, and benzene concentrations <br /> remain above recommended action levels in samples from those <br /> T wells, it is the opinion of Applied GeoSystems that active <br /> 3 <br />