Laserfiche WebLink
25775 PATTERSON PASS ROAD - 2 - • 14 March 2000 <br /> oxygenates. In December 1999, ARCO requested Sequoia Analytical (Sequoia) to review available <br /> chromatograms to determine if MtBE was present in soil samples collected and analyzed by EPA <br /> Method 8020. Sequoia reviewed 28 chromatograms and estimated MtBE concentrations at <br /> <0.100 mg/kg to <2.50 mg/kg. Sequoia stated that their instrumentation was not calibrated to <br /> specifically look for MtBE in 1991, and the results of their review are qualitative at best. Board chemist, <br /> Mae Hoe also reviewed the chromatograms, and stated that an unidentified peak is present prior to <br /> benzene in some of the chromatograms, which may indicate the presence of MtBE in the sample. <br /> The vertical extent of soil contamination has been defined on-site to a depth of 115 feet below ground <br /> surface (bgs), or approximately 165 feet above mean sea level (MSL). The depth to TPHg and BTEX <br /> contamination in soil increases from the northwest to the southeast as shown on Figures 3 and 4 from <br /> Pinnacle's Hydrocarbon Mass Evaluation. Boring logs indicate cemented silts that may have restricted <br /> the downward movement of site contaminants, causing the distribution of soil contaminants as shown on <br /> the figures. The IT Group has estimated that 32,537 gallons of TPHg remain in soils both on-site and <br /> offsite. Groundwater was not encountered in soil borings at a total depth of 116 feet bgs, and monitoring <br /> wells have not been installed. <br /> On 8 March 2000, Ms. Lagorio and I visited the site to determine the distance to the nearest offsite water <br /> supply well and the California Aqueduct. During this site visit, we recognized the ground surface <br /> elevation at vapor wells VW-18, VW-19, and VW-20 is approximately 20 feet lower than the on-site <br /> vapor wells. Based on the completed depths of these"vapor"wells from 73 to 88 feet below ground <br /> surface (bgs), and the increase in water levels throughout San Joaquin County since 1996, groundwater <br /> may be present in these wells. <br /> The on-site water supply well was installed in 1969. This well is at the southwest comer of the property <br /> near Patterson Pass Road approximately 150 feet from the former USTs. The surface elevation at this <br /> well is approximately 280 feet above MSL. The well is constructed with 8-inch casing to 540 feet bgs, <br /> screened from 396 to 416 and from 496 to 536 feet bgs, and gravel packed from 35 to 540 feet bgs. <br /> According to the driller's log, a sanitary seal was not installed. One soil boring was completed to 45 feet <br /> bgs near this well in March 1992, and only low concentrations of toluene and xylenes were identified at <br /> 10 feet bgs. A water sample from this well was analyzed using EPA Method 8021 and 8260B in <br /> August 1999, and all constituents were nondetect. The depth to water measured when the well was <br /> sampled was 39.85 feet bgs. Since this well is gravel packed from 35 feet to 540 feet, contaminants <br /> intercepting the gravel pack may disperse vertically into deeper water bearing units. <br /> A sensitive receptor survey was not completed for this site; however, County staff identified a second <br /> water supply well approximately 2,500 feet northwest of the site at 26116 Patterson Pass Road. The <br /> well is owned by Eugene Sparks, and the surface elevation is approximately 300 feet above MSL. The <br /> Sparks well is constructed with 6-inch casing to 193 feet bgs, screened from 153 to 193 feet bgs, gravel <br /> packed from 50 to 193 feet bgs, with a sanitary seal to 50 feet bgs. The depth to water after well <br /> completion was listed at 63 feet bgs. <br /> The California Aqueduct is approximately 1,200 feet northeast of the site. In a 29 February 2000 <br /> Department of Water Resources (DWR) letter, the DWR described a slope failure along the California <br /> Aqueduct in Merced County resulting in petroleum-contaminated groundwater from an upslope UST site <br /> entering the aqueduct. I contacted Mr. David Duval of the DWR Byron Field Division to determine if <br /> the petroleum release at the subject site could impact the aqueduct. Mr. Duval stated that streams <br />