Laserfiche WebLink
Water Level, Floating Hydrocarbon. and Total Well Depth <br /> Measurements <br /> Before purging and sampling occurred, the depth to water, floating hydrocarbon thickness, and <br /> the total well depth were measured using an onl/water interface measuring system The oil/water <br /> interface measuring system consists of a probe that emits a continuous audible tone when <br /> immersed in a nonconductive fluid, such as oil or gasoline, and an intermittent tone when <br /> immersed in a conductive fluid, such as water The floating hydrocarbon thickness and water level <br /> were measured by lowering the probe into the «ell Liquid levels were recorded relative to the <br /> tone emitted at the groundwater surface The sonic probe was decontarrunated by being rinsed <br /> with deionized water or steam cleaned after each use A bottom filling, clear Teflon'"' bailer was <br /> used to verify floating hydrocarbon thickness measurements of less than 0 02 foot Alternatively, <br /> an electric. sounder and a bottom-filling Teflon bailer may have been used to record floating <br /> hydrocarbon thickness and depth to water <br /> Tile electric sounder is a transistorized instrument that uses a reel-mounted two-conductor, <br /> coaxial cable that connects the control panel to the sensor Cable markings are stamped at 1-foot <br /> intervals The water level was measured by lowering the sensor into the monitoring well A <br /> low-current circuit was completed when the sensor contacted the water, which served as an <br /> electrolyte The current was amplified and fed into an indicator light and audible buzzer, signaling <br /> when water had been contacted A sensitivity control compensated for highly saline or conductive <br /> water The electric sounder was decontaminated by being rinsed with deionized water atter each <br /> use The bailer was lowered to a point lust below the liquid level, ietrieved, and observed for <br /> floating hydrocarbon <br /> Liquid measurements were recorded to the nearest 0 01 foot in the Depth to Water/Floating <br /> Product Survey Form The groundwater elevation at each monitoring well was calculated by <br /> subtracting the measured depth to water from the surveyed elevation of the top of the well casing <br /> (Every attempt was made to measure depth to water for all wells on the same day ) Total well <br /> depth was then measured by lowering the sensor to the bottom of the well Total well depth, used <br /> to calculate purge volumes and to deterrrune «hether the well screen was partially obstructed by <br /> silt, was recorded to the nearest 0 I foot on the Depth to Water/Floating Product Survey Form <br /> Well Purging <br /> Before sampling occurred, a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) bailer, centrifugal pump, low-flow <br /> submersible pump, or Teflon bailer was used to purge standing water in the casing and gravel <br /> pack from the monitoring well Monitonng %Nells were purged according to the protocol <br /> presented in Figure A-1 In most monitoring N, ells, the amount of water purged before sampling <br /> was greater than or equal to three casing volumes Some monitoring wells were expected to be <br /> evacuated to dryness after removing fewer than three casing volumes These low-yield monitoring <br /> wells were allowed to recharge for up to 24 hours Samples were obtained as soon as the <br /> monitoring wells recharged to a level sufficient for sample collection If insufficient water <br /> recharged after 24 hours, the monitoring well "as recorded as dry for the sampling event <br /> I <br />