Laserfiche WebLink
a <br /> Mr. William S. Johnson <br /> October 1, 1985 <br /> Page Two <br /> HYDROGEOLOGY <br /> The unconfined groundwater table beneath the Douglas station is contained in <br /> a medium to fine grained silty sand zone from a depth of approximately 45 feet <br /> to a depth of approximately 65 feet and continues in a sandy clay material to <br /> the bottom of the boring. The direction of groundwater flow has steadily been <br /> toward the southeast throughout the monitoring period. Table 1 indicates the <br /> change in the groundwater elevation from July 1985 until September 27, 1985. <br /> In general, the groundwater level has descended more than 5 feet since the <br /> installation of MW-1, MW-8, and MW-9 in May 1985. In other words, the ground- <br /> water table has descended at a rate of approximately 1.25 feet per month during <br /> the dry summer. <br /> The product discovered in MW-8 has become suspended in the soil and appears to <br /> be localized. Specifically, the lateral extent of the free product does not <br /> reach MW-10, MW-12 or MW-14 which are downgradient of MW-8. In addition, MW-11 <br /> or MW-13, which are upgradient of MW,8, do not contain any evidence of free <br /> pioduct. <br /> Samples were taken of each groundwater well on August 27, 1985, by Twining <br /> Laboratories, Inc. and analyzed as described in Table 2. Groundwater monitor- <br /> ing wells MW-1 and MW-9 did not recharge to an acceptable volume to secure an <br /> accurate sample due to their total well depth. The analysis indicates that <br /> there is a presence of soluable constituents of petroleum hydrocarbon in MW-10, <br /> MW-12, MW-113, and MW-14. <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> The concentration of the soluable constituents of petroleum hydrocarbon found <br /> in MW-10 indicate that the leaks discovered at the Phase II Vapor Recovery <br /> connections to the storage tanks have not had a significant impact on the <br /> groundwater. Furthermore, if the unleaded tank which received the internal <br /> epoxy coating had leaked, free product would be present in MW-1 and MW-10 <br /> because of their proximity to the storage tanks. <br /> The product discovered in MW-8 is localized and is presently suspended in the <br /> soils above the groundwater. Extraction of free product is not possible with <br /> the current groundwater conditions. However, the unconfined groundwater shall <br /> recharge to a higher elevation following the rainy season. It is possible <br /> that extraction of free product may be accomplished following the recharge of <br /> the groundwater. <br /> REMEDIAL ACTIONS - ALTERNATIVE I <br /> The groundwater conditions warrant further monitoring on a weekly basis to <br /> determine the piezometric level, the direction of flow and the presence of <br /> free product. Each groundwater monitoring well shall be sampled and analyzed <br /> monthly to determine the concentrations o� soluable constituents of petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon. <br />