Laserfiche WebLink
Mr Kenneth Earnest <br /> Ultramar Inc <br /> April 27, 1995 -- <br /> Page 2 <br /> During the time period from December 28, 1994 through March 22, 1995, the SVE system had <br /> operated for approximately 902 hours (—38 days)out of 2,016 hours (--84 days). The system down <br /> time was caused by abnormal high water vapor content in the soil vapor stream due to the local heavy <br /> rainfall received in January through March 1995 Table 1 presents the cumulative hours of system <br /> operation through March 22, 1995 Normal system operation and maintenance site visits were <br /> performed by Western States Instrumentation on January 18, February 7, and March 22, 1995 <br /> Table 1 presents the collected monitoring data for these events <br /> On February 7, 1995, field instrument data indicated that the system's hydrocarbon destruction <br /> efficiency had fallen to 90 percent It is believed that this reduction in destruction efficiency was only <br /> a temporary event due to the uncontrollable high levels of water vapor present in the soil vapor <br /> stream In an effort to improve the system's destruction efficiency, the system was adjusted and <br /> allowed to continue to operate to attempt to dry out the moisture laden soil vapor stream Based on <br /> data presented by Ultramar, the system's temperature chart recorder indicated that the system had <br /> shut down the next day (February 8, 1995) due to high water in the 55 gallon knockout drum. The <br /> water was pumped into a container from the knockout drum and the system was subsequently <br /> restarted on February 9, 1995. On February 15, 1995, the temperature chart recorder indicated that <br /> the system had shut down again on approximately February 10, 1995, due to high water in the water <br /> knockout tank The water was pumped out of the tank and the system was subsequently restarted on <br /> February 15, 1995 The system was closely monitored and system adjustments were made during <br /> the following 48 hours (February 16 and 17, 1995) The system was eventually turned off on <br /> February 17, 1995, due to poor destruction efficiency On February 29, 1995, the system's catalyst <br /> was removed for inspection and repair On March 22, 1995, the repaired catalyst was reinstalled and <br /> the system was temporarily started and operated for approximately two hours The system was again <br /> turned off due to persisting high moisture levels in the soil vapor stream. It will remain off until <br /> dryer system conditions transpire or until a more efficient water knockout tank can be evaluated and <br /> installed <br /> Remarks/Signatures <br /> The information contained in this report represent our professional opinions, and are based in part, <br /> on information supplied by the client These opinions are based on currently available information <br /> and are arrived at in accordance with currently accepted hydrogeologic and engineering practices at <br /> this tune and location Other than this, no warranty is implied or intended <br />